Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative in nyc
By the way, the headline of this report is misleading. The dead person was paid a little over $130,000 since his or her death in 1974, not each year.

I thought that $130,000 annually meant that $130,000 per year for 30+ years (damn near $4,000,000).

Did I mis-read?

69 posted on 02/02/2007 8:49:51 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Always use a silencer in a crowd. Loud noises offend people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Triggerhippie
The writer misread (or didn't read) the actual report. My saying it is misleading is charitable. It is flat out wrong. It's not what the actual report or the WPVI-TV story Fox News.com is relying on said. Both said the "deceased" was paid $130,000 in total, not $130,000 per year since his death.

The actual report says, on page 81, "One employee was hired in 1966 and retired August 1, 2006; according to the SSA, he passed away in 1974. Since then, checks have been issued in his name totaling $130,822 after taxes." The report also says ALL 10 people who received compensation from the Camden school district after they were supposedly deceased received a total of $380,830.34. So it is not possible that he received $130,000 per year for 30+ years.
71 posted on 02/02/2007 9:09:07 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson