To: shrinkermd
Interesting article. I have something further to add. Today, Hillary Clinton professed that the oil company profits need to be taken away and given to the little companies. I say: if you believe in redistribution of wealth, then why don't you take away the profit from Comcast corporation for their record 3rd quarter profit (today's paper alongside the Exxon article...Star and Trib.). If you further have disdain for capitalism, then take away Bill Clinton's profits from his speeches.
I have come to the conclusion that the libs don't know diddly squat about economics!
To: jcmfreedom
Interesting article. I have something further to add. Today, Hillary Clinton professed that the oil company profits need to be taken away and given to the little companies. I say: if you believe in redistribution of wealth, then why don't you take away the profit from Comcast corporation for their record 3rd quarter profit (today's paper alongside the Exxon article...Star and Trib.). If you further have disdain for capitalism, then take away Bill Clinton's profits from his speeches.
I have come to the conclusion that the libs don't know diddly squat about economics!
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Agreed. This is a prime example of what happens when you try to inject morality into economics. I would add also that libs don't no diddly squat about morality either.
To: jcmfreedom
Some libs understand economics. Some do not. Economics is not relevant to their worldview. It can be useful to their poses for the gaining of power sometimes.
163 posted on
02/07/2007 4:58:28 AM PST by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson