LOL!
I thought it would be a simple yet elegant way too slow down a viral transmission.
That said, I can't believe the amount of people who will swallow the 'nanny government knows whats best for me' hook, line and sinker without even checking the facts for themselves.
It'll be a cold day in you-know-where before my girls get injected with something because Governor Goodhair thinks it's a good idea.
Just watch....this unnecessary and unproven 'vaccine' (for a virus that can't even pass statistical muster well enough to be labeled an 'epidemic', IMHO) will be related to all kinds of immunological and reproductive problems.
I just wish I knew as much about the chemicals in these vaccinations when my children were younger.....I know at least one of them would be much better off if I had.
I don't recall even flu vaccines being made mandatory during an epidemic and the death rate from flu complications would kill more during an epidemic than this virus allegedly does with cervical cancer.
Why this then? Any female is far more likely to die from ANYTHING else than this; things that are much more easily dealt with in terms of prevention. Something about this whole thing is very fishy.
No way this justifies the kind of governmental interference that is happening.
It'll cut down on transmission of other things, too. Just think, one shot takes care of it all.