Posted on 02/02/2007 1:28:44 PM PST by YCTHouston
nice try.
busy·body noun, plural -bodies.
a person who pries into or meddles in the affairs of others.
[Origin: 1520Â30; busy + body]
ÂSynonyms snoop, pry, meddler, Nosy Parker; gossip, blabbermouth.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
busybody
n. pl. bus·y·bod·ies
A person who meddles or pries into the affairs of others.
American Heritage Dictionary
Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
busybody noun
a person who meddles in the affairs of others
WordNet® 2.1, © 2005 Princeton University
I can always move to the backwoods of Mississippi, or Louisiana. Sure, they lag way behind the state of Texas, but if I don't have to give up my parental rights (given to me by GOD), then that's a fair trade.
It's not "most effective" then. According to Merck's research, it can be administered any time between ages 9 and 26 and have the same efficacy.
Bingo. So why not wait until 18 and let her make her own choice as to whether she thinks she needs it?
No. A voluntary program would be strictly opt-in. In Perry's scheme it automatically assumed that the parents will comply. It is the burden of the parent to REQUEST PERMISSION from the state to be labelled a "conscientious objector" to the pill. In order to do that you have to fill out a legal affadavit.
HOME SCHOOL REASON #...
That list just keeps getting longer.
Thanks for your thoughtful discussion of the subject.
>>>This is not about public health.<<<
BINGO! It is about the state telling parents how they must raise their children.
Lol...I will pass that thought on to some homeschooling friends.
I am sorry about your daughter, but mass mandated vaccinations of eleven-year-old girls is not going to eliminate cervical cancers.
That's the simple truth.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could go back to the sexual standards of the forties and fifties, where virgin marrying virgin was the rule rather than the exception?
The fact that Merck manufactured Vioxx, or if they scarifice puppies on an altar to Satan, has nothing to do with the errors pointed out in your post.
I disagree. I'm against mandated chicken pox vaccines as well. This is a treatment that is being over used. Again read on autism. Read on therasol and read why in 1970 we were only giving 6 shots and now we are up to 26...
Its all about money. We aren't talking measles mumps small pox that kill. We are talking about something that is preventable and treatable if your are responsible and go for your annual screenings. It is not worth injecting 10 year olds without adequate testing and finding out 20 years from now we have a whole genration of problems.
There is much presidence for what i am saying. Only now the problems nexium cause are coming out. Only now is problems vioxx is coming out. Liptor and dementia.. and on and on it goes. But you don't do this to a 10 year old.
Someone mentioned thelidomide. What happens when these mandated children start having children with birth defects. What is gov zoolander going to do then.
Lastly back to autism for just a second, thersol has been used since the 1930s and is high in mercury. you have increased the expose from 6 to 26 doses and are now seeing the effects of the problem ... These #s don't lie. So any 'new' shot with no track record is concerning to me. For the gov of a state to advocate its citizens recieve a shot in this manner shows that gov is not for the people of his state and needs to be recalled. If it was such a great idea why not put it before the legistature. Why do by EO. Why, because he knew if he did it would have never passed. Period.
my cervical cancer was never detected by pap smears. I was finally diagnosed when I was 4 mos. pregnant. The pap smears were never conclusive, and I couldn't have any samples taken until I was 8 mos. pregnant due to the risk to my baby. It was to late by then, it was very advanced. My baby is fine, me, not so much. But if my obgyn hadn't been very old and very experienced, she wouldn't have realized anything was amiss.
No, it'll just eliminate 90% of cervical cancers. That's good enough for me.
This has nothing to do with children and everything to do with adults. How you raise your daughter has no impact whatsoever on whether her husband, on her wedding day, infects her with HPV.
You weren't alive back then, where you? Or, if you were, you lived amongst a very different group of people.
Really? So I take it you're morally opposed to mandatory use of the polio vaccine in affected areas? What are you, an employee of the iron lung industry?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.