Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: siunevada
There must be a treaty against using dum dum's...

Yes there is - it's called the Geneva Convention and the signatories have to use 'full metal jacketed' ammunition so that it doesn't 'mushroom' on impact. Of course Al Quaida is not a signatory but it doesn't matter - we are and will will continue to comply...

18 posted on 02/02/2007 12:32:03 PM PST by Friend_from_the_Frozen_North (Temps were down to -40 Fahrenheit (now 30 Above); guess ALGORE is right - we have been Warmin' Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Friend_from_the_Frozen_North
There must be a treaty against using dum dum's...

Yes there is - it's called the Geneva Convention and the signatories have to use 'full metal jacketed' ammunition so that it doesn't 'mushroom' on impact.

The Russians got around that with their 5.54mm round: it has a hollow nose cavity under the jacket. Looks like a solid, ball round, but the thin gilding collapses and it acts like a hollowpoint after impact.

38 posted on 02/02/2007 12:41:07 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Friend_from_the_Frozen_North; siunevada; null and void

Of course, doesn't the Geneva Convention also prohibit cutting off the heads of prisoners, as well as using film of prisoners being tortured and murdered for propaganda purposes?


54 posted on 02/02/2007 12:52:00 PM PST by Flatus I. Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Friend_from_the_Frozen_North
It's actually the the Hague Convention of 1899, not one of the Geneva Conventions.

The Convention also doesn't mention hollow points or mushrooming bullets. That is how we have interpreted the convention.

It's an interpretation of one line in Section II, Chapter I, Article 23:

---

Besides the prohibitions provided by special Conventions, it is especially prohibited:--

To employ poison or poisoned arms;

To kill or wound treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army;

To kill or wound an enemy who, having laid down arms, or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion;

To declare that no quarter will be given;

To employ arms, projectiles, or material of a nature to cause superfluous injury;

To make improper use of a flag of truce, the national flag, or military ensigns and the enemy's uniform, as well as the distinctive badges of the Geneva Convention;

To destroy or seize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.

---

However, since that is how we have interpreted it for a very long time it would be very difficult to change that interpretation.

74 posted on 02/02/2007 1:03:55 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson