Some animals are equal, but...
There are far more black-on-white hate crimes than the other way around.
Anyone who says otherwise hasn't looked at the crime statistics.
Because they are basically cowards. You'll never see these jackholes picking a fair fight that they might lose.
Thank you dead,
beware: NY times has you on their black-list.
If it wasnt for you, I'd have to pickup my usual "SYDNEY Morning Herald" along with my bagel w/cream cheese and coffee this morning.
Isnt it poignant that it still had to take some rag from AUSTRALIA to read this.
Oh? How many Americans are even going to read, see or hear about this story? The MSM won't because their idea of freedom of speech and the press ONLY applies to their agenda.
|
Consultant Ned: You must build a giant catapult. To fire the greatest of projectiles at the sloths of Los Angeles.
Sir Arthur: What kind of projectile?
(Consultant Ned throws a portfolio/sack upon the roundtable)
Consultant Ned: This.
Sir Arthur: Are you suggesting we throw money at the problem?
Consultant Net: Precisely.
There is no authority to arrest somebody for not liking somebody else or even *saying that they don't like somebody else.*
While liberals and people seeking revenge, fantasize that **THINKING IS VIOLENT** because they must find, somehow, "violence" in all that they oppose --- in order to justify thought police state actions --- they have no Constitutional ground upon which to arrest what displeases them and theirs.
The point is, that one of the major ojections among our Founding Fathers (and their ancestors), which gave rise to our new country, was that in the old country, there was too much, and in the history of other countries, there was too much:
Abuse by government - wherein these governments arrested people and usually locked them away in some dungeon, because of what they were thinking, alleged or otherwise.
Our Founding Fathers were ardently opposed to Thought Police State Authority.
Now, because so much "hate crime" prosecution has resulted in a very great bias in fact and in the liberal media and in the public eye ... where so-called "minorities" have been the "victims," there have been occasions when "the white people" have been set upon by so-called "minorities," and some in the public want to enforce "hate crimes" prosecutions, in order to, putting it mildly, "reverse [the long overdue] discrimination."
Does not matter - their wishes to reverse things or get revenge - it is not Constitutional, and ALL "hate crimes" criminal statutes should be promptly revoked and torn up.
They are an abomination and grievous affront to our Constitution, which originally intended that our government(s) not get into the business of Thought Police Actions --- see the First Amendment!
The complete spelling actually made it to print (in an Australian paper).
""I think the case will redefine how Americans look at hate crimes," Hutchinson says. "Traditionally, African-Americans were victims."
This is baloney. Since the introduction of hate crime laws the majority of perps have been black and the majority of victims white and latino. The media has always misrepresented the facts to play on white guilt.
Savages. I'm sick of people telling me I should feel guilty for being white. You don't see whites forming gangs of 30 and killing, raping and mauling blacks. No, it's the other way around these days. The black community as a whole should be ashamed of themselves and grow the hell up.
Both the media and the government have made it easy for blacks to hate whites; there is no reason to think that some of that might not manifest itself as violence.
Whites will do what they have done since 1965; move farther away. When that isn't far enough, they'll move again.