Giuliani's campaign confirmed that leaving off the Republican designation wasn't a typo. It was the campaign's "judgment that we didn't have to fill in that box," said a campaign lawyer.
Just like Giuliani's judgement that he doesn't have to agree with any of the Republican Party Platform to be a Republican candidate.
Dear Spiff,
I saw that. That's part of what makes so little sense.
Then there's this in the article:
"The lawyer said an update filed Wednesday lists him as a Republican, though that form couldn't be found on the Federal Election Commission Web site."
Is this form allegedly filed Wednesday the second form that you cited in your post?
Thanks,
sitetest