Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator

Some good links, although I would like to know Quay's assumption for carbon cycle time or seawater diffusion constant. I noticed in the PDF poster there is typo in your post: 0.021 decrease per year, not 0.002 like you and I thought. That's a lot more than the anthro contribution that I calculated (0.004 per year) from the NASA carbon numbers (quite simply, 6 parts anthro into 1560 parts seawater/atmosphere). This reversal means that seawater is absorbing a lot more anthro CO2 than I outlined in post 7.


71 posted on 02/02/2007 7:31:02 AM PST by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
This reversal means that seawater is absorbing a lot more anthro CO2 than I outlined in post 7.

OK, it should be. Thanks for checking.

83 posted on 02/02/2007 10:51:54 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson