Skip to comments.
Warming 'likely' man-made, unstoppable
AP on Yahoo ^
| 2/1/07
| Seth Borenstein - ap
Posted on 02/01/2007 7:51:40 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: NormsRevenge
is "very likely" caused by man "Very likely" is a phrase for fortune cookies and the Magic 8-Ball. Not for science.
2
posted on
02/01/2007 7:53:54 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(Blink 182 isn't just a band, it's Nancy Pelosi's per-minute average.)
To: NormsRevenge
3
posted on
02/01/2007 7:54:50 PM PST
by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: NormsRevenge
That was the strongest conclusion to date, making it nearly impossible to say natural forces are to blame. Natural forces are to blame. That was not only not nearly impossible, it was quite easy.
To: NormsRevenge
Aaaaaaaaaaaaggggghhhhh!!!!
5
posted on
02/01/2007 7:55:29 PM PST
by
pax_et_bonum
(I will always love you, Flyer.)
To: NormsRevenge
Annoyance is "very likely" caused by global whining idiots posing as scientists.
Can scientists be sued for malpractice when they recklessly abandon the scientific principal when speaking on behalf of science?
6
posted on
02/01/2007 7:55:31 PM PST
by
anymouse
To: JennysCool
The phrase "very likely" translates to a more than 90 percent certainty that global warming is caused by man's burning of fossil fuels. That was the strongest conclusion to date, making it nearly impossible to say natural forces are to blame.
What that means in simple language is "we have this nailed," said top U.S. climate scientist Jerry Mahlman, who originated the percentage system.
--
"Very likely" is a phrase for fortune cookies and the Magic 8-Ball. Not for science.
and climate scientists too. ;-)
7
posted on
02/01/2007 7:55:48 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......)
To: JennysCool
"Very likely" is a phrase for fortune cookies and the Magic 8-Ball And in this politically-charged atmosphere the phrase means "highly unlikely."
8
posted on
02/01/2007 7:55:58 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: NormsRevenge
Just once I'd LOVE to hear someone aske these global warming evangelicals, "what caused the global warming that ended the last ice age?"
Mark
9
posted on
02/01/2007 7:56:22 PM PST
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: NormsRevenge
Sorry. I stopped reading at "Paris-"
This rubbish will never end.
10
posted on
02/01/2007 7:56:32 PM PST
by
volunbeer
(Dear heaven.... we really need President Reagan again!)
To: NormsRevenge
RRRROOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAD.....
Apples!!
11
posted on
02/01/2007 7:56:34 PM PST
by
Wings-n-Wind
(The answers remain available; Wisdom is obtained by asking all the right questions!)
To: NormsRevenge
"The bigger the lie, ............"
To: NormsRevenge
Short version;
The people who believe global warming is man made were somehow shocked that they proved it. Most of the blame can be put squarely on the US. Now their biggest task is to determine how best to mess up America, whether it solves the problem or not.
13
posted on
02/01/2007 7:56:59 PM PST
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: NormsRevenge
What that means in simple language is "we have this nailed," said top U.S. climate scientist Jerry Mahlman, who originated the percentage system. What a geniues. Every two or three years they pull a bigger percentage out of their ass. Some needs to win a Nobel Prize for that.
To: NormsRevenge
Agree with the unstoppable part. Unless of course we can send alGore to the sun to pi$$ on it. Even then I doubt he would have much effect.
I like the idea of them putting out the scary part and holding the science part until the hype dies off. That way no one can rebut the hype with the science. Cute, don't you think. Got to wait until May to see the real stuff.
I say we put the whole hoax on ice until May.
Quick, someone tell me how the ice melted 15,000 years ago and caused the sea to go up 400 feet in the last 15,000 years. You know what you get with their latest hype, it's called well within the margin of measurement error.
15
posted on
02/01/2007 7:58:05 PM PST
by
Tarpon
To: NormsRevenge
Ok, we're doomed .... let's party!!!
16
posted on
02/01/2007 7:58:59 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
("Those That Would Rather Have Security Than Freedom Deserve Neither")
To: NormsRevenge
We're basking in the heat, here!!
17
posted on
02/01/2007 7:59:13 PM PST
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Carry Daily. Apply Sparingly.)
To: NormsRevenge
San Antonio, Texas
18
posted on
02/01/2007 8:00:03 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(It's snowing in Texas, where is OUR global warming?)
To: NormsRevenge
Where I live was once underwater several thousand years ago. What caused it then if there were no people around?
19
posted on
02/01/2007 8:00:23 PM PST
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: NormsRevenge
The phrase "very likely" translates to a more than 90 percent certainty that global warming is caused by man's burning of fossil fuels. That was the strongest conclusion to date, making it nearly impossible to say natural forces are to blame Yes, AP is absolutely correct. We must now fully accept the uncited quotation of "very likely", couple it with the (made up) percentage of 90%, and conclude that:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson