[Lurker]

In a contest between liberal and liberal-lite, the liberal will win every time.

I think Limbaugh said something like that.

But what the hell. Why not work to put another liberal in the WH. In a couple more election cycles there won't be any way to tell the difference between the Republican and Democrat parties.

And it will largely be due to the sterling efforts of folks like you.

Of course you are from Chicago so I guess supporting liberals is ingrained genetically somehow. So I suppose it's no wonder your judgement is impaired.

Spending so much time in an area with a complete dearth of anything even remotely conservative can really screw up ones judgement.

Of course according to your pal onyx no one cares who we vote for anyway.

L

[nopardons]

I was neither born or raised nor do I now live in Chicago; though yes, I once did live in that city.

Unlike YOU, I refuse to EVER allow another damned Dem to garner the presidency and WILL do anything at all to insure that does NOT happen.

If Rudy is the GOP candidate, unlike a Dem, he is NOT for raising taxes, increasing the size of government, affirmative action, and a whole host of other things that Dem are. He also would NEVER capitulate on the WOT.

You are more than willing to not only get no glass at all, but broken glass shards stuffed down your gullet, if you can't have a full glass. No thanks; my way is much better. :-)

[BigSkyFreeper]

In a contest between liberal and liberal-lite, the liberal will win every time.

I think Limbaugh said something like that.

If Giuliani is nominated, it will eat you alive when Rush throws his support behind Rudy. 

[BigSkyFreeper]

Rush says alot of things, one thing Rush has stated over and over again is he would not support a third party candidacy in the general election, because third parties largely are irrelevant, and uninspiring.