What statement is that? I haven't seen any mention in any of his 8 press releases, or the various articles of a temporary visa.
As the prosecuting attorney and the person responsible for issuing the immunity, he is an expert source for that information, and without provable testimony of impeachment there is no basis on which to believe otherwise.
I was asking about the visa you mentioned. What are you talking about?
Unlike the defense, and WND, Sutton's JOB is to tell the truth in these matters...
Then why doesn't he, instead of going on the media circuit saying that the BP agents willfully shot an unarmed fleeing subject in the back, without sharing the pesky details that the story is based solely on the word of an alien drug smuggler who was given immunity (with help from his lifelong buddy, agent Sanchez--also given immunity) and contradicts the stories of the agents? Sutton spins--that is not truth.
Just so you're not left hanging, here is the post I think was referenced in Charles' post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1769226/posts?page=44#44
I'm with Charles on this. Until I see actual evidence—not innuendo or rumor or guessing—this is the definitive statement. If it easily proved wrong, do it.