The old national ID debate rears its head again.
1 posted on
02/01/2007 7:55:56 AM PST by
7jason
To: 7jason
I'm glad to see that some people still believe in states' rights.
2 posted on
02/01/2007 7:56:20 AM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
To: 7jason
This idea came out of which administration?
3 posted on
02/01/2007 7:58:08 AM PST by
em2vn
To: 7jason
5 posted on
02/01/2007 8:00:41 AM PST by
TBP
To: 7jason
The Dems hate it because they are afraid it will be used to catch all the snowbirds who are registered to vote in Florida and New York/New Jersey/Etc.
6 posted on
02/01/2007 8:01:02 AM PST by
RebelBanker
(May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.)
To: 7jason
What's the objection to RealID. That there is a uniform standard?
7 posted on
02/01/2007 8:07:43 AM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(Celebrate Monocacy!)
To: 7jason
From the article: Montana is just one of at least 10 states considering bills to reject the Real ID Act, signed into law in May 2005 as part of the emergency supplemental relief bill to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and for tsunami relief.
The RINOs knew that such an abomination could not stand on its own and were hoping people wouldn't see it, and so they attached it to the a bill that they knew would be passed.
To: traviskicks
13 posted on
02/01/2007 8:38:29 AM PST by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: 7jason
A national ID is as bogus as our currency or federal "privacy" laws like HIPAA.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson