[Stone Mountain]

True, but there is also a difference between a nonprofit church community using the Super Bowl as a fund raiser, than a business doing the same for commercial profit.

No, actually there isn't. Unless you are saying that any non-profit group should be able to flaunt the rules. Would you defend the people's right to charge to watch the Superbowl if it were for a fund raiser for the non-profit groups Planned Parenthood or a Muslim mosque or The Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies instead of a church?

[HEY4QDEMS]

It's a moot point, the church changed the admission charge to free and still no dice.

Here is the chronology of excuses by the NFL

You can't do this cuz your screen is to big.
(Paster indicated that he will try to come up with a different solution)

NFL changes it's excuse to 'You can't do this cuz you're charging admission.
(Paster changes policy and informs league that their will be no fee charged)

NFL Changes it's excuse to 'You are going to show a christian message from Lovie Smith and Tony Dungy while at the same time using the words "Super Bowl" to advertise your event and you can't do that'.

It's quite apparent that no matter what he proposes to do, the NFL will simply come up with another excuse to shit on his plans.