Dick Morris: Hillary will be ‘worst president we’ve ever seen’

The Examiner ^ | 1 Feb 2007 | Jeff Dufour and Patrick Gavin

[R.W.Ratikal]

Dick Morris, as usual, is wrong, wrong on both counts.

First, Hillary will never even win the nomination for president, much less win. My guess is that the insiders behind the scenes who pull the strings, will never give her the nod. The country is not ready for a full-blown dedicated Marxist president. Besides, she has too much personal negative baggage.

The defection of the Hollywood gang to support Senator Obanna (D-IL) against her is an indication that even the hardcore traditional voting blocs who normally support Democrats will fun for the hills from Hillary.

Second, Bill Clinton will forever hold first place as Worst President in U. S. history, worst even than the Great Wall Street Socialist, Franklin D. Roosevelt.

[Rummyfan]

Like a stopped clock, Morris is right once in a while!

[Yo-Yo]

You make a very good point, there. Today's Republican Party is much closer to JFK's Democratic Party of 1960.

As the center shifts, both parties will shuffle to stay just to the left or right of it.

[MortMan]

So, Hillary is running to ensure that Slick's legacy gets a boost?

[Zeroisanumber]

Confirmation that the Hildebeast will never be President!!!

You're right on there. Dick Morris is the worst political prognosticator that I've ever seen. Why does anyone bother printing this buffoon's half-baked predictions anymore?

[AndrewB]

Who is Carlton Tucker?

[Doogle]

Dick Morris: Hillary will be ‘worst president we’ve ever seen’

Yo toe licker, who ya backing?

[MadIvan]

Hillary COULD BE President - she has a lot of money, is very well organised. Her negatives is that she is the worst public speaker I've ever heard, and second, she is evil incarnate.

Obama COULD BE President - however, he is so new and raw that his inexperience will reveal itself at some point. Beyond this, he's a liberal loon.

If the Democrats want a slam dunk, it's Richardson, with Breseden in the VP slot.

Regards, Ivan

[Rummyfan]

Tucker Carlson?

[Androcles]

I don't think she'll ever make it to the White House. Not that I am advocating it, I am not, but there are enough whacko's in this country that I think someone will get to her. Even a few foiled attempts and it will finally sink in that she will never be President and will bow out.

If you refer to assassination attempots, there are several aspects:

1: a 5% plus bump minimum in the polls if someone tries to kill her.

2:Their popularity with assassins should not be a yardstick for their ambition. Plenty of Presidential candidates will ontinue to attract nutjobs, but that doesn't disqualify them regasrdless of party. 3: I'd be more likelty to vote for sonmeone where they were nearly assassinated but carry onn, purely on sentimental reasons. I may not like their politics, but I approve their courage. Any physical attack ona Demo candidate wuill tar the Republicans, even though no one believes it was their doing.

[CharacterCounts]

The main difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals think idealistically and conservatives think logically.

The main difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives think and liberals do not.

[GeorgefromGeorgia]

Please tell me you are right! Also, tell me who is going to defeat her.
Rudy could probably beat her, but may not get the nomination. Duncan Hunter is great, but he has little name recognition. Romney and McBain can't do it. Brownback is a conservative except for immigration.

[rawhide]

Tucker Carlson?

Yes, that is the one! Ummph! My brain is frozen along with the weather this morning!

[seanmerc]

Nahhh, a stopped clock is right twice a day.

[tfelice]

I appreciate the humor, but in truth when we understand how liberals think we can best counter their arguments with logic, reason and facts. Take any social program a liberal might want to put in place. They always do so to "solve" a perceived problem, without looking at the cold, hard facts surrounding the issue. Again it's idealistic thinking without consideration of the logical implications of what impact the program would have or in truth if a program is even needed.

Listen to their speeched on minimum wage for example. The liberal line was that low-income earners cannot support a family on minimum wage. While that might be all well and good, liberals don't go past the idealism and look at the fact that only a minute percentage of people are trying to support a family on minimum wage and that and increase in the rate would actually cost some of those people their jobs. Their idealistic goals are clouded by their complete lack of logical thinking.

[Old Grumpy]

"...but thanks to demographic shifts favoring Republicans, namely the rising Hispanic and African-American populations, that will be the last Republican president we'll ever see.

Huh?"

Yeah, I was wondering about that too. But considering it's Dick Morris . . .

[SpringheelJack]

If the Democrats want a slam dunk, it's Richardson, with Breseden in the VP slot.

Richardson, from what I've seen, is a pretty poor speaker, out of shape, the type of guy who when he speaks just seems to ooze mediocrity. He might win if he runs but I don't think he's a slam dunk at all, and in fact if I had to rank him in terms of electability I'd put him behind all the major Dem candidates, except maybe Hillary, who has huge negatives.

[tarheelswamprat]

If Hillary Clinton is our next President, she will probably be the last President.

[MadIvan]

He's difficult to attack in a simple way. He was in charge of the Los Alamos fiasco, but that's murky. He's a Western governor who (reputedly) cut taxes - he's difficult to attack as being a left wing moonbat.

If the Democrats have a West and South ticket that doesn't inspire rage or fear in the conservative base (like Hillary), they'll be tough to beat.

Regards, Ivan

[MadIvan]

If Hillary Clinton is our next President, she will probably be the last President.

I'll have a good laugh at all the people I know who left for America or retired to America from Britain to be taxed less, if she wins.

Otherwise I'll be paranoid for 4 to 8 years about her having the power to destroy Western Civilisation.

Regards, Ivan