To: dyed_in_the_wool
It was a very expensive stunt that inconvenienced thousands of people and drew public safety resources away.
Check out This Gallery of pictures to get an idea of the mess it caused.
9 posted on
02/01/2007 3:30:46 AM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: billorites
Did the stunt inconvenience thousands - or the inappropriate reaction of Boston's finest?
14 posted on
02/01/2007 3:34:05 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: billorites
It was a very expensive stunt that inconvenienced thousands of people and drew public safety resources away. It was a advertising gimmick; the expense and inconvenience came when the authorities panicked.
30 posted on
02/01/2007 4:04:53 AM PST by
Grut
To: billorites
It was a very expensive stunt that inconvenienced thousands of people and drew public safety resources away.
So if someone called in and said that there was a cartoon character holding a large alarm clock which ticked in large downtown city, should Sponge Bob be held responsible if the police send a hundred fire trucks and police cars?
To: billorites
311 posted on
02/01/2007 12:23:23 PM PST by
Dr.Deth
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
