Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sgtbono2002
"Kids call in bomb threats at schools and disrupt classes, They are held criminally responsible."

Did somebody call in a "bomb threat"? If so, they need to be prosecuted big time. If not, then it is simply a prank gone wrong. They could get them for littering or advertising without a permit or some other relatively silly ordinance violation but the "bomb scare" was solely in the minds of passers by and the city itself.

If your trying to lug a few suitcases through the airport and a bag drops unnoticed as you continue on and a police officer sees an unattended "package" and calls the bomb squad and they evacuate the terminal, and they take 27 8x10 color glossy photographs with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explainin' what each one was to be used against you in a court of law.... should you be held responsible for the officer's overreaction?

Of course, he was acting on the side of caution but that doesn't mean we (as bag droppers) can't goof up from time to time anymore because of the events of 9/11.

67 posted on 02/01/2007 4:48:06 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Hatteras

We have to agree to disagree on this one.

This was a stupid stunt.

At the least someone should pay for the problems it caused.

It wasnt funny taken in context with the way the world is today.


70 posted on 02/01/2007 4:52:10 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (I will forgive Jane Fonda, when the Jews forgive Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Hatteras
If your trying to lug a few suitcases through the airport and a bag drops unnoticed as you continue on (...) should you be held responsible for the officer's overreaction?

You really should try to keep track of your bags in an airport. There are signs all over the place telling people to report suspicious unattended packages and suitcases. What do you suppose is going to happen if your suitcase is unattended? Your carelessness is going to inconvenience a lot of people.

But you should not be liable, because you had no intent to cause a problem. The difference is the intent. You were just going about your legitimate business and wound up causing a problem unintentionally. Unless you conduct was outrageous or negligent, there is not problem.

But this was not accidental. These things were put all over the place intentionally. They were designed purposefully. There is intent in spades. That is the difference.

100 posted on 02/01/2007 5:14:55 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson