Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga
Seems kind of like hate crimes to me. How could you ever prove something like that?

Intent is the difference between manslaughter and murder. It's the difference between a clerical error and fraud. It's the difference between unauthorized entry and buglary. Courts consider intent every day, and consider it when arriving at appropriate punishment.

The thing about Hate Crimes legislation is that it deals with the motivation behind the intent, which is taking it a step further.

As an example, suppose I ran over somebody with my car. If it was an accident, I might be reckless or negligent or drunk or something. If I did it on purpose, I am guilty of homicide. If I did it because of the person's protected status as a minority, then I would be guilty of some additional hate crime.

308 posted on 02/01/2007 12:14:25 PM PST by bondjamesbond (Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]


To: bondjamesbond
Intent is the difference between manslaughter and murder.

This is this case if they called it in you would consider it intent, and if they didn't they should just be guilty of posting signs without a permit.

312 posted on 02/01/2007 12:25:45 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson