Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Caesar Soze
Yeah, right. Build in a photosensor to conserve two dollars' worth of batteries. Why not put in a wireless access point and install Linux, too?

No, genius. You conserve the batteries to save you the expense and trouble of having to go out and replace them in two weeks. The cost of the batteries is negligible, as is the cost of a photo cell. The expense is in the labor. These things were designed to be placed and left, presumably. A unit that only works in the dark will work for twice as long.

164 posted on 02/01/2007 6:17:28 AM PST by bondjamesbond (Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: bondjamesbond
No, genius. You conserve the batteries to save you the expense and trouble of having to go out and replace them in two weeks. The cost of the batteries is negligible, as is the cost of a photo cell. The expense is in the labor. These things were designed to be placed and left, presumably. A unit that only works in the dark will work for twice as long.

So you think the people that put these up were considering visiting them regularly to maintain them? They were intended to be left, then found later and kept as souvenirs. The CEO of the marketing company said as much to the Boston Globe. I doubt anyone thought they'd be up more than a couple days. The photosensor would've added costs in material, brainpower, and labor for something that is basically a throwaway advertisement -- a high-tech flier.

175 posted on 02/01/2007 6:26:00 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson