Your post spoke for itself but I guess you are trying to weasel out of it. You asked for more than a handful of threads prior to Nov. on Duncan Hunter because you say that he is a nobody and was not known whatsoever. Well, I provide you with evidence and you have nothing to say for your ignorance. The man has been on shows, been in an important committee chairmanship, has been a vocal critic of the media and Demonrat shenanigans as shown in those threads. Why were there even threads, ANYTHING written about Duncan Hunter if he was really just a nobody?? As for the $10, that just shows how unconfident you were in your claims. YOU are the one who chose to make such a wager and the one who put yourself in this place by your ignorant post. Like I say, you have no idea of what you speak.
Well, that settles it! I'm changing my tagline!
You asked for more than a handful of threads prior to Nov. on Duncan Hunter because you say that he is a nobody and was not known whatsoever. [That is NOT what I said.]
Well, I provide you with evidence and you have nothing to say for your ignorance. [Your "evidence" confirmed exactly what I said. Two posts per year for three years is not more than a handful and only one of those attract any interest.]
Why were there even threads, ANYTHING written about Duncan Hunter if he was really just a nobody?? [You cannot be serious with that question. There are threads all the time which are interesting only to the one creating them. I never called Hunter a "nobody" in any case merely pointed out that he was about as unknown as a Congressman can be. You have NOT shown that to be false.]
I made no "wager" I said I would contribute another $10 to FR and rather than quibble about the meaning of a handful I will do so. It isn't like contributing money to the DNC so I don't mind.