Posted on 01/31/2007 6:01:03 AM PST by Risha
Liberals create their own "facts".
I don't believe them if they tell me what day of the week it is.
David Icke: The Bush family is one of these--Illuminati, royal--bloodlines that go back to ancient times and these are shapeshifters that can take either human or reptilian form. It's all holographic trickery because everything, including the body, is a hologram and not 'solid' as it appears to be. I have had many reports of people seeing father Bush shapeshift. As for Kerry, he is said by Burkes Peerage to be more 'royal' in his bloodline than any American president, so he's of the shapeshifter bloodline, too. Only the bloodline gets into the Skull and Bones Society. Kerry and Bush are both related to the British royal family and Vlad the Impaler ('Count Dracula'). Readers of my books will understand the significance of this.
ROFL!
So, Obama's a comedian. I never would have guessed!
Knowing Democrats, I think they consider the War on Poverty a great success for those same reasons. After all, more people dependent upon government equals more votes for them.
I usually say that the guys in the news media like Obama because they'd like to have sex with him. They know that Obama will never be able to meet them at the bath house, so they will vote for him as it's the next best thing. If Obama becomes president, he'll screw us all often.
Perhaps he was responding to Senator Joe Biden's comment that Obama was the first "mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy'..."
On the other hand if Obama was referring to the following liberal positions then I believe he provides additional evidence supporting my Theory of Liberals. My theory asserts that liberals are persons who lack the gene required to mentally process reality. The theory is unproven until the gene is identified and isolated. However, there is much empirical evidence to support the premise of my theory.
Let me share some observations I’ve gathered from Free Republic post.
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can help small men by tearing down big men?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can strengthen the weak by weakening the strong?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can help the poor man by destroying the rich?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can build character and courage by taking away men's initiative and independence?
Is it the liberal or the conservative who believes you can help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves?
Today's liberals have so sullied the term that even they shy away from it, preferring euphemisms like "progressive." (By that, they mean "progress" on the road to socialism.) If this is too abstract, here are a few practical distinctions:
Conservatives believe in individual freedom and responsibility.
Liberals believe in sacrificing individual freedom for socially desirable outcomes.
Conservatives believe in limited government.
Liberals believe that one of government's primary roles is social engineering.
Conservatives believe in free markets.
Liberals believe in government controls and central planning.
Conservatives believe that some problems have no solution and can only be mitigated at best.
Liberals believe that most every problem has a government solution.
Conservatives are concerned about the production of wealth.
Liberals are concerned about the redistribution of wealth.
Conservatives believe in the equality of opportunities.
Liberals believe in the equality of outcomes.
Conservatives believe that human nature is what makes us imperfect.
Liberals believe that human nature can be changed and perfected.
Conservatives believe in peace through strength.
Liberals believe in peace through cooperation and good will.
There are many other examples. Some are listed below whose liberal solutions defy logic in light of reality.
Why does a liberal feel that other citizens are not paying “their fair share” of taxes when taxpayers with 17% of the income pays 30% of the taxes?
Why does a liberal believe that throwing yet more money at education will improve its quality but adding educational choice will not?
Why does a liberal support the increase in the number of additional laws which historical have been the first sign of corruption and tyranny?
Why does a liberal agree with the government when it subsidizes, taxes, regulates, and then sues a product manufacturer?
Why does a liberal oppose capital punishment of the guilty while supporting the capital punishment of an innocent fetus?
Why does a liberal offer his vote in exchange for favors so votes from those who pay the taxes to cover the favors are not needed.
Why does a liberal support using welfare money to sue gun manufacturers instead of using the money to arrest the offenders?
Why does a liberal believe that guns are an ineffective means of self-defense for rational adults, but in the hands of an ignorant criminal they become a threat to society?
Why does a liberal believe that women are just as capable as men, and yet gun advertisements aimed at women are "preying on their fears?”
Why does a liberal believe that the police who operate in groups need larger capacity magazines than civilians, who must face criminals alone, and therefore need less ammunition?
Why does a liberal agree with the conservative that black citizens are equal and then support affirmative action and quotas indicating the liberal believes that blacks are not equal?
The empirical evidence that liberals cannot process reality is virtually unlimited but I won’t include the two hundred or so additional observations I have collected from Free Republic. Feel free to add comments or additional observations.
I won't make the obvious dig and say that liberals are stupid (but they HATE it when you say that they are and they REALLY HATE it if you have the intellectual credentials to back it up) but they are emotional. They're proud of it. They begin from emotion and only attempt reason to justify their emotional views.
Just as predicted. Obama's mother Ann Dunham was a 60's unitarian free love fruitloop. When she wasn't licking frogs in the South Pacific or popping out anchor babies for muslim deadbeats, Dunham was busy indoctrinating her kids in marxist garbage. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
This is the empty suit who Biden chides and now says logic is the foundation of Leftist thinking. Let us count the ways oh Obama over , say the last 50 years of who was right on domestic, international relations , national security, education, economics, tax policy, Medicare and Social Security salvation.
Yeah, sure, if you say so.
Here Obama's arguement for why he is entering the Presidential Race. I don't see anything grounded in "reason", in fact I don't see him give any reason why he should be President:
A Message from Barack As many of you know, over the last few months I have been thinking hard about my plans for 2008. Running for the presidency is a profound decision - a decision no one should make on the basis of media hype or personal ambition alone - and so before I committed myself and my family to this race, I wanted to be sure that this was right for us and, more importantly, right for the country.
I've never heard Osama talk about issues and as far as I can see it's all just media hype.
I certainly didn't expect to find myself in this position a year ago. But as I've spoken to many of you in my travels across the states these past months; as I've read your emails and read your letters; I've been struck by how hungry we all are for a different kind of politics.
Empty word ALERT: What is a different kind of politics?
So I've spent some time thinking about how I could best advance the cause of change and progress that we so desperately need.
Empty word ALERT: What does advance the cause of change and progress that we so desperately need really mean?
The decisions that have been made in Washington these past six years, and the problems that have been ignored, have put our country in a precarious place. Our economy is changing rapidly, and that means profound changes for working people. Many of you have shared with me your stories about skyrocketing health care bills, the pensions you've lost and your struggles to pay for college for your kids. Our continued dependence on oil has put our security and our very planet at risk. And we're still mired in a tragic and costly war that should have never been waged.
Finally a position. He's against the war. I guess you could read the rest of the paragraph any way you want but I read it as there are not enough government handouts. The government should be paying heating bills for layabouts.
But challenging as they are, it's not the magnitude of our problems that concerns me the most. It's the smallness of our politics. America's faced big problems before. But today, our leaders in Washington seem incapable of working together in a practical, common sense way. Politics has become so bitter and partisan, so gummed up by money and influence, that we can't tackle the big problems that demand solutions.
EMPTY WORD ALERT: heh? From what I can see it's the Dems who are small and petty. Remember when that feminist and communist Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg was confirmed 98-2.
And that's what we have to change first.
God has sent us Osama, err Barak /sarcasm
We have to change our politics, and come together around our common interests and concerns as Americans. This won't happen by itself. A change in our politics can only come from you; from people across our country who believe there's a better way and are willing to work for it. Years ago, as a community organizer in Chicago, I learned that meaningful change always begins at the grassroots, and that engaged citizens working together can accomplish extraordinary things. So even in the midst of the enormous challenges we face today, I have great faith and hope about the future - because I believe in you. And that's why I wanted to tell you first that I'll be filing papers today to create a presidential exploratory committee. For the next several weeks, I am going to talk with people from around the country, listening and learning more about the challenges we face as a nation, the opportunities that lie before us, and the role that a presidential campaign might play in bringing our country together. And on February 10th, at the end of these decisions and in my home state of Illinois, I'll share my plans with my friends, neighbors and fellow Americans. In the meantime, I want to thank all of you for your time, your suggestions, your encouragement and your prayers. And I look forward to continuing our conversation in the weeks and months to come. Sincerely,
MORE EMPTY WORDS ALERT: Other than being against the war and for more nondescript government handouts, why does the creep want to be president?? To "engage citizens working together"? Because he "has great faith and hope about the future"? Because "We have to change our politics, and come together around our common interests and concerns as Americans. "
What about the real issues?? Social Security? The role of the federal government - should Washington be paying for plowing roads, buying school books or firefighting equipment? What about Illegal Immigration? What about anything? Are you really the empty headed loser that this statement coveys?
There you have it, a good liberal arguement "grounded in reason".
I can't top the previous posts but here goes.
Liberals oppose capital punishment of the guilty adults but viciously defend capital punishment of the innocent unborn.
Liberals support wars of Liberal presidents only
Liberals killed more with banning DDT and opposing abstinence programs than Vietnam and Iraq combined.
Liberals support Feminism, except for Muslim Women who are just making a lifestyle choice.
Liberal science says the globe is warming, and a Bush is president therefore the warming is manmade and we need nuremburg trials for warming deniers. Conservative science first studies if the warming exists, and conducts experiments and observation to determine the cause. What warming caused the last several Ice ages to end?
Gay parents for a kid is a right and a choice, but school vouchers for normal parents are racism.
Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, and Chicago cops need guns.
NORMAL LIBERAL: Don't you think it is disturbing that Bush started a war based on misinformation?
BUSH SUPPORTER: I think it is MORE disturbing that Hans Blix, David Kay, Bill Clinton and France ALL THOUGHT THAT IRAQ HAD WMD'S AND DID NOTHING ABOUT IT.
Somebody who has suffered from something speaks with absolute moral authority about that subject and cannot be questioned, unless they support the war then they should be spat on.
Obama is a good candidate just because hes a rockstar personality, but Hitler was a bad candidate because he had a rockstar personality.
The United States should ask the opinions of countries with one tenth its GDP to make sure we pass the global test.
Rodents are seed vectors, but liberals are useless.
in 1939 England and France where obligated by treaty to defend Poland but dropped leaflets instead, even though Hitlers forces where in Poland and the British and French forces outnumbered the Nazis on the western front 5 to 1. They could have struck a devastating blow and shortened WW2. Hitler was a bully who knew the appeasement party allies would not do anything about Poland.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.