Additonally, the visit to Khamenei may never have taken place and was simply added as part of the "normal protocol" in reproting the story to provide standing for everything. Even if Bandar never saw Khamenei, he is not going to deny the reports that he did.
the visit to Khamenei may never have taken place and was simply added as part of the "normal protocol" in reproting the story
poetic license? This is supposedly a report of facts, is it not?
If he really met with Kameinie, then that would indicate that he was alive and fairly well a week ago. That's very important in lieu of everyone saying he's dead. It stood out to me and should be of interest to others.
If he didn't really meet with Kameinie but the reporter is saying he did, then how many other details of the report are made up?
I'm just trying to get to the facts.