Gun crime: Labour 'losing control'

Press Association Ltd ^ | Jan 25 | unsourced

[TC Rider]

Labour has been accused of losing control of gun crime as new figures show a sharp rise in armed robberies.

Guns were used in 4,120 robberies last year - a 10% jump - including a 9% rise to 1,439 in the number of street robberies where guns were used.

There was also a rapid and unexplained increase in the number of times householders were confronted in their own homes by armed criminals. Residential firearms robberies show a 46% leap, a record 645 cases in England and Wales - up 204 on the previous year and four times the level recorded in 2000-01.

The figures come a day after two men armed with a replica gun robbed a Home Office worker on his way home after sharing a curry with Home Secretary John Reid. The 29-year-old civil servant was making his way home in Beckenham, Kent, shortly before midnight when he was attacked.

A Met Police spokeswoman said the man's wallet and mobile phone were taken and confirmed that two teenage men remain in custody at a south London police station.

The Home Office report shows that handguns are the most commonly used firearm in robberies, reported in 2,888 cases.

Shadow home secretary David Davis said of the figures: "This shows Labour is losing control of gun crime across the board, whether it be on the street or in innocent people's homes.

"Gun crime is mainly fuelled by gang warfare and drug addiction, which is a consequence of Labour's failing drugs policy. It is exacerbated by our porous borders, which allow illegal weapons to flow into the country."

Home Office minister Tony McNulty said: "Firearm offences have fallen significantly, by 14% in the year up to September 2006, which amounts to 1,642 fewer incidents.

"While there is a small rise in residential firearm robberies, these account for a tiny proportion of recorded offences overall, although we recognise any firearm incident is traumatic for victims." He added: "We have some of the toughest firearm legislation in Europe."

[Mac1]

"Any infringement on the right of citizens to keep the means of self defense will tend to be expanded for the protection of the ruling elite."

Right. Give 'em an inch and they take a mile. Guard your rights with care - DON'T get complacent; speaking from experience. Ironically however, the ruling elite might actually keep gun ownership alive in my country - some of those double barrelled rifles cost the same as a new Ferrari!

[magslinger]

Ironically however, the ruling elite might actually keep gun ownership alive in my country - some of those double barrelled rifles cost the same as a new Ferrari!

First off, gun control does not apply to the elite themselves. One of the most rabid anti-gunners in this country has armed guards.

Secondly, that Ferrari-like price tag may in itself be an infringement. How much of the cost is in taxes and other government costs? Pricing the means of self defense out of the range of anyone is itself an infringement.