Skip to comments.
Fleischer: Plame came up over lunch ["Ambassador Wilson was sent by his wife," Fleischer recalled..]
Yahoo ^
Posted on 01/29/2007 10:34:34 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Is this 'throw Libby under the train' day at the trial?
2
posted on
01/29/2007 10:39:33 AM PST
by
IncPen
(When Al Gore Finished the Internet, he invented Global Warming)
To: Sub-Driver
"Plame came up over lunch"
Unfortunate phrasing...sounds like reflux.
3
posted on
01/29/2007 10:40:31 AM PST
by
Leg Olam
("Somethings got to go, either me or that wallpaper.." last words, Oscar Wilde)
To: Lee Heggy123
4
posted on
01/29/2007 10:42:05 AM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: Sub-Driver
Ari might be a real problem for Libby.
5
posted on
01/29/2007 10:43:04 AM PST
by
misterrob
(Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
To: IncPen
Is this 'throw Libby under the train' day at the trial? Hey Libby was willing to throw Cheney under the train. Payback is hell. Libbys problem is not challenging Fitzgerld on the validity of Plume being covert. Unless she is covert, no law was broken, period! This trial should have been over in 5 minutes!
6
posted on
01/29/2007 10:44:03 AM PST
by
Bommer
(If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?)
To: IncPen
If that is what happened, Fleischer has a responsibility to tell the truth. That beings said, if convicted, Libby will be pardoned and GW will state the reason he was pardoned is Fitzgerald never charged the actual leaker of Plame, which Fitzgerald was appointed to do.
7
posted on
01/29/2007 10:44:50 AM PST
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: Sub-Driver
Let's wait for the cross examinaion.
8
posted on
01/29/2007 10:45:22 AM PST
by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: Bommer
"Libbys problem is not challenging Fitzgerld on the validity of Plume being covert. Unless she is covert, no law was broken, period! This trial should have been over in 5 minutes!"
It was always my understanding that the Judge disallowed that in the grand jury.
9
posted on
01/29/2007 10:46:36 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Sub-Driver
This whole thing is such a non-story, why is it even going to trial.
This is the "Seinfeld" of scandals, a scandal about nothing.
10
posted on
01/29/2007 10:46:59 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Championship U)
To: Sub-Driver; Howlin
11
posted on
01/29/2007 10:47:55 AM PST
by
rwa265
To: Preachin'
It was always my understanding that the Judge disallowed that in the grand jury. If that is so, then I don't understand whats the charge? The judge disavows the law, throws out the rule of the law, so no law could have been possibly broken! Fitzgerald who crux of his argument is that a covert CIA agents name was leaked out is now null and void is it not?
12
posted on
01/29/2007 10:51:00 AM PST
by
Bommer
(If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?)
To: Sub-Driver; A Citizen Reporter; AliVeritas; alnick; AmeriBrit; AmericaUnited; arasina; ...
Scoooter Ping!!
13
posted on
01/29/2007 10:51:40 AM PST
by
Howlin
(The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
To: Sub-Driver
Hmmmm...no documentation.
14
posted on
01/29/2007 10:52:50 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Bommer
"If that is so, then I don't understand whats the charge?"
I think that they are attempting obstruction of justice, or perjury. That's a real sham. though.
15
posted on
01/29/2007 10:54:23 AM PST
by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Sub-Driver
This is idiotic. I still can't remember what I had for breakfast yesterday, and these people claim to remember who told them what on which day in 2003.
Granted, they are probably smarter than me, but I have my doubts that they are that much smarter.
16
posted on
01/29/2007 10:55:00 AM PST
by
freespirited
(Honk for disbarment of Mike Nifong.)
To: Sub-Driver
Why is this important? It certainly does not prove that he was not surprised when he learned it from a reporter. All it proves is that he repeated it to Fleischer.
To: Bommer
Libby being on trial has nothing to do with the Plame revelation but is simply about lying to the grand jury about when he found out about Plames's status.He said he found out about her from reporters including moonface Russert. He lied to the grand jury on this one but the whole trial is ridiculous.What a complete waste of taxpayer dollars. If Fitzgerald were a decent man he would have dropped the charges all together.He is NOT a decent man.
To: Sub-Driver
"Spot the Spook" is a staple of Washington DC lunchtime gossip and has been for generations.
19
posted on
01/29/2007 10:59:25 AM PST
by
bondjamesbond
(Have you ever noticed that whatever the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes"?)
To: freespirited
"Granted, they are probably smarter than me,"
Don't sell yourself short. You'd be amazed how many people in positions of power, especially Washington, have IQs scantly higher than their shoe size.
20
posted on
01/29/2007 11:00:35 AM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson