Note that this link provides evidence that the drug smuggler would not have been able to keep running after being shot. But instead of accepting the clear implication that Ramos is NOW LYING when he says he had no idea he hit the guy and that the guy kept running, the pro-BP agent folks argue this proves that Ramos didn't shoot the guy at all, but rather he was shot later either by himself or by the drug kingpin mad about losing his drugs.
Oh, but that link ALSO claims that the bullet wound proves that Ramos is telling the truth that the drug smuggler turned toward him in a threatening manner.
Pretty good deal, if you can get it -- the same story both claims the drug dealer was not HIT by the bullet, and that the way the bullet HIT him proves the defense position.
So, the bullet that was NOT shot by Ramos proves that the perp who was shot later in his house was "blading" toward Ramos when he was not shot by Ramos.
This is what passes for logic on the defense side. That and branding every prosecuter a crook, simply because a few democrats we know of are crooks.