[KC_Conspirator]

President Bush handily won the popular vote in 2004 - but could have been forced to yield to Massachusetts John Kerry, had 60,000 votes in Ohio swung the other way.

Boy, what a lie. Bush won that state by much more.

This is just unconstitutional, but since when did liberals care abouts anyones rights.

[Michael.SF.]

Boy, what a lie. Bush won that state by much more.

I thought the same thing, but when confirming the number of Electoral votes for Ohio, I saw that Bush won by about 119,000 votes. I then took it that they were saying if you subtract 60,000 from Bush AND add it to Kerry, then Kerry would have won.

Of course since we 'stole' the election, those 119,000 votes were 'diebold' votes so the Dems would have needed 120,000 'Chicago' votes to make up the difference.

But who are we to spoil their fantasies?