No, I was in the US Army. The question is offensive, given that the context made this crystal clear. But apparently, you hve nothing useful to say so you have resorted to the inane smears of your Hindutva paymasters.
I find it very funny..that you keep referring to the Indian government as the 'Indian regime'.. This particular phrase in US is usually used for non-democratic governments like Pakistan..china...
India's democracy has her flaws but even with all those flaws..India's government is answerable to her people and undergoes revision every five years..That does not happen in any 'regime'. It is a joke to call India's government a 'regime'
As far as being blood thirsty is concerned, i would say India's government would not really qualify...There is no Saddam sitting at the top in India...Everything is open...If the government kills someone, there would parades of newspaper reports and news channel reports...That argument does not stand..Some other 'regimes' would qualify as blood thirsty china or Pakistan.....
As far as Khalistan is concerned...How long do you plan to flog that dead horse....What would the Sikhs gain by getting Khalistan that they already don't have..??. In case you have not noticed already, the prime minister happens to be a Sikh..Sikhism is part of India as much as Hinduism....No Hindu ever refuses to bow his head to the 'Wahe Guru'....The whole khalistan arguement was settled by the Sikhs themselves in the 90s..I donot want to get into that issue any longer....
"No, I was in the US Army."
LOL! And I am the Emperor of Mongolia!
More likely you are in custody of the US army at Gitmo.