Replies

In an affidavit filed by DHS on March 15, 2005, with the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Texas, special agent Christopher R. Sanchez swore the following:

Ballistics testing confirms a government-issued weapon belonging to U.S. Border Patrol Agent Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos, a 96D Beretta .40 caliber automatic pistol, serial number BER067069M, fired a bullet (a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson jacketed hollow point) which hit the victim in the left buttocks while he was attempting to flee to Mexico.

Contrasted with the actual contents of the lab report, this combination of documents provides prima facie of a FELONY by FBI agent Sanchez of PERJURY.

Remember that Congress impeached Bill Clinton for committing perjury. If perjury was so serious by Bill Clinton to impeace a sitting President, can we simply overlook it in the FBI? In Clinton's case, it was a one-time thing about Paula Jones.

But in the case of the FBI, it is probably going to happen again unless we put a stop to it. How many other people are going to go to jail based on lies from the same special agent? Or is it the culture of the entire office?

Chris Sanchez is an investigator with the DHS Office of Inspector General not the FBI. One of the problems with this case is that the FBI was completely left out of the the loop when it is their repsonsibility to investigate the case.

I generally agree with your post #17--Christopher Sanchez is looking guilty of Perjury, if not much more.

One technicality: Christopher Sanchez was (reportedly) a Special Agent at the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at DHS--not the FBI. According to Friends of the Border Patrol (testimony by Andy Ramirez), he was a a four-month trainee, having previously served as an ICE agent in Arizona prior to that.

As to your post #18, I don't think you meant to direct that to me. I was simply pointing out that it has only been one year since the trial completed, not two years as Corsi wrote in the article.