To: ExtremeUnction; countreegurl
IF... what you say is even the slightest bit true... the remaining 5% will eventually die, fall over and rot, supply a wealth of bug-bait to infect the rest of the forest ANYWAY!!!
What is wrong with you? Were talking about something here that gets born, lives a long life, then dies off EVEN IF NEVER HARVESTED for the benefit of all mankind for which it was created by God in the first place!!!
We have his WORD on it!!!
28 posted on
01/28/2007 4:13:19 PM PST by
SierraWasp
(Wasn't one "Co-Presidency" enough? Will we now have to see who SHE "does" in the oval office???!!!)
To: SierraWasp; calcowgirl; tubebender
Threads like this are the reason I seldom comment anymore. The issue is private property rights, not "saving the redwoods". How about "save america"? How about "save the constitution"? How about "save the free market"?
What about the fact that socialism or gov't control of land is the quickest way to destroy it? What about the fact that the comapny makes money growing redwoods? What about the fact that the very liberals that hate redwood logging, build redwood decks to "keep up with the Jones'"?
47 posted on
01/28/2007 8:55:37 PM PST by
forester
(An economy that is overburdened by government eventually results in collapse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson