I'll refute you again, since you seem to be deaf:
Even if you grant your man credentials on "fiscal and public safety issues," (they're largely contrived, but whatever) that doesn't change the fact that he's a statist socialist. Down through history, lots of statist socialists have been great at making the trains run on time. Does that mean we should want one in the most powerful position on earth? Might work for you, but not for me.
So cutting taxes, reducing the size of city government, and protecting citizens from crime (which is a legitimate gov't function) is socialist now. Got 'cha.