Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proxy_user
I’m pro-choice. I’m pro-gay rights, Giuliani said. He was then asked whether he supports a ban on what critics call partial-birth abortions. “No, I have not supported that, and I don’t see my position on that changing,” he responded. Source: CNN.com, “Inside Politics” Dec 2, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Rudy_Giuliani_Abortion.htm

ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES (November 14, 2006)

RUDY GIULIANI (R), FORMER MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY: I'm pro- choice. I'm pro-gay rights.

KING: Giuliani supports a woman's right to an abortion, and back in 1999, he opposed a federal ban on late-term abortions.

GIULIANI: No, I have not supported that, and I don't see my position on that changing.

KING: Immigration could be another presidential landmine. Back in 1996, Mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants.

JEFFREY: He took the side of illegal immigrants in New York City against the Republican Congress.

KING: Giuliani opposes same-sex marriage but as mayor, he supported civil unions and extending health and other benefits to gay couples. He also supported the assault weapons ban and other gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association.

GIULIANI: I'm in favor of gun control. I'm pro-choice.

Republican Big-Wigs Support Pro-Abortion Event in NY

Pro-abortion Governor George Pataki and New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who also supports unrestricted abortion, are co-chairs of the 2000 Choice Award Presentation to be held on May 30 at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City. The event is sponsored by the Republican Pro-Choice Coalition, a group that is campaigning for the removal of the pro-life plank from the Republican National Platform.


http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200503010743.asp


6 posted on 01/28/2007 8:28:26 AM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: narses

So what does this have to do with fighting terrorists?

Do you expect the gays to obtain a nuclear weapon any time soon?


11 posted on 01/28/2007 8:32:35 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: narses

I know I have seen this somewhere before and I still don't care!


24 posted on 01/28/2007 8:55:09 AM PST by JimFreedom (let's not let good be the enemy of perfect to our detriment. - Cable225)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: narses

More spam. And yet, you admit you are not doing very well in preventing abortion nation-wide. Ever consider that your approach is off-putting?


131 posted on 01/28/2007 11:25:30 AM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: narses
OK. But don't you think that as of now staying alive -- i.e. fighting terrorism - should be our main concern?
157 posted on 01/28/2007 11:49:33 AM PST by mench (The New York Times - fitting all the news to print.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson