Posted on 01/27/2007 9:33:27 PM PST by bstein80
Ryan Sorba, a conservative student, dismantles the idea that human beings are "born gay."
Here is the link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4207851797866730699
Lavender bump?
Its been over 30 years since the "Born Gay" Hoax was first foisted upon the American people.
In all that time, with all the DNA analysis that has been done, ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO evidence has actually come forth to support the theory, yet the media pretends it is fact.
Every homosexual I know, which is over a dozen now in all my years, has been recruited by an aggressive homosexual.
No, I've never heard that. Klinefelter's Syndrome, or presence of the XXY chromosome, usually has side effects like poor gonadal developement, some learning disabilities, and infertility. Gayness is not one of the symptoms.
This is likely so. And Howard Stern is responsible for 90% of all the 'lipstick lesbians'.
Sure. There are about 5 million guys out there with XXY chromosomes. You are joking, right?
I could go through case after case of people I know who were straight, had a bad relationship and began confiding in a homosexual that worked with them and was veeeeery sympathetic.
They start off just talking, then booze or drugs become involved, and the next thing you know, your friend is a homosexual and was *born that way*.
The DNA would prove it, but they cannot find any DNA proof.
The genetic abnormalities/defects Turner syndrome(XO), poly-x syndrome(XXX), Jacob syndrome(XYY) and Klinefelter syndrome (XXY) are not procreant genotypes. XX and XY chromosomes are immutable after conception when mitosis begins.
No matter how many X chromosomes there are, anyone with the Y chromosome is male. These anomalies are so few, only one one in several thousands occur.
No person is "transgendered" nor can any person ever have a "sex change;" it is disfigurement and erroneous terminology.
So much for the "gay gene," it does not exist. Homosexuality (another erroneous terminology) is either a choice, birth defect or mental illness. Take your pick...
Who is he that is not of woman born?
Was Freudian psychoanalytic theory of sexual stages in psychological development more accurate than accredited?
The Michael Jackson Complex is fixation on mutilation of and deviance with human anatomy in the media. It is a social psychosis catering to the lowest common denominator and generated with Pavlovian behavioral conditioning in popular culture.
Should we really be canonizing special societal privileges in the law based on idolatrous fetishes? Disability, welfare, Social Security, etc., etc., ad nausea...
The social psychosis generated by behavioral conditioning (Pavlov's salivating dogs) in the popular culture and the conditioned response to accept the false premises of mental illness or birth defect will be used as a political tool to systematically rob the public purse.
Then, we could have other self-inflicted mental illness and disease (aside from those we already do) subsidized by the government consolidating an ever increasing portion of the economy in the hands of the cultural Marxists.
The genetic abnormalities/defects Turner syndrome(XO), poly-x syndrome(XXX), Jacob syndrome(XYY) and Klinefelter syndrome (XXY) are not procreant genotypes. XX and XY chromosomes are immutable after conception when mitosis begins.
No matter how many X chromosomes there are, anyone with the Y chromosome is male. These anomalies are so few, only one one in several thousands occur.
No person is "transgendered" nor can any person ever have a "sex change;" it is disfigurement and erroneous terminology.
So much for the "gay gene," it does not exist. Homosexuality (another erroneous terminology) is either a choice, birth defect or mental illness. Take your pick...
Who is he that is not of woman born?
Was Freudian psychoanalytic theory of sexual stages in psychological development more accurate than accredited?
The Michael Jackson Complex is fixation on mutilation of and deviance with human anatomy in the media. It is a social psychosis catering to the lowest common denominator and generated with Pavlovian behavioral conditioning in popular culture.
Should we really be canonizing special societal privileges in the law based on idolatrous fetishes? Disability, welfare, Social Security, etc., etc., ad nausea...
The social psychosis generated by behavioral conditioning (Pavlov's salivating dogs) in the popular culture and the conditioned response to accept the false premises of mental illness or birth defect will be used as a political tool to systematically rob the public purse.
Then, we could have other self-inflicted mental illness and disease (aside from those we already do) subsidized by the government consolidating an ever increasing portion of the economy in the hands of the cultural Marxists.
DNA methylation can account for 100% of the problem.
And genetic anomalies are genetic in nature, right?
Which means that there could be a "gay gene".
Still, I'm holding out for plain old DNA methylation that occurs in one or more genes that affect sexual matters ~ this can be inherited (if the methylation occurs in the cells responsible for producing sperm or eggs). It can also happen at any stage of life due to methylation occurring that affects the genes involved in sexual matters.
We are all at risk which is why trillions of dollars must be tossed into the mill to discover a cure for homosexuality.
Wow, a whole dozen? Now that's a scientific survey. I've been around gay people my entire life, not a dozen, but dozens and dozens, and every single one of them, without exception, discovered they were attracted to the same sex at the same time that we heterosexuals discovered we were attracted to the opposite sex. For most people, gay and straight, that's around the age of 11 to 14. Many of the gay people I know were married or in committed relationships with a member of the opposite sex for years and years before they "came out." Ask them why they suddenly became gay after 20 years of marriage and they will tell you that they were always gay, but thought that a heterosexual marriage or relationship would "cure" them of their homosexuality. At some point they come to realize that they are still attracted to the same sex no matter how hard they have tried to live a straight life, and they decide to stop living a lie and ignoring the obvious, and come out. And guess what, despite my close relationships with many gay people over the years, I am still very straight, so at least in my case, the theory that "peer pressure" from gay people causes homosexuality, does not hold true.
Which means that there could be a "gay gene".
No, defective chromosomes with abnormally variant alleles.
The "gay gene" is an erroneous terminology in both parts and is an obfuscation of the fact that mammals reproduce only one way. The desire to mate is inherently heterosexual.
Humans, always having a choice in their conscious behavior, can make no legitimate logical excuses to rationalize it.
And, as I have said...
The social psychosis generated by behavioral conditioning (Pavlov's salivating dogs) in the popular culture and the conditioned response to accept the false premises of mental illness or birth defect will be used as a political tool to systematically rob the public purse.
Then, we could have other self-inflicted mental illness and disease (aside from those we already do) subsidized by the government, consolidating an ever increasing portion of the economy in the hands of the cultural Marxists.
The desire to mate is inherently heterosexual...
The social psychosis generated by behavioral conditioning (Pavlov's salivating dogs) in the popular culture and the conditioned response to accept the false premises of mental illness or birth defect will be used as a political tool to systematically rob the public purse.
Then, we could have other self-inflicted mental illness and disease (aside from those we already do) subsidized by the government, consolidating an ever increasing portion of the economy in the hands of the cultural Marxists.
Do you mean "mate" or "procreate?"
How about something far more common like DNA methylation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.