[Strategerist]

I'd paste the whole thing but it's several hundred pages (takes that long to list all the transitional fossils.)

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html

[doc30]

I'd paste the whole thing but it's several hundred pages (takes that long to list all the transitional fossils.)

Those aren't transitionals because there is always room for another transitional between any two so-called transitionals!

[thiscouldbemoreconfusing]

There are a few problem with your posting this as fact:

Taken at random from your link:

"So here's the summary of the horse sequence. For more info, see the Horse Evolution FAQ. Loxolophus (early Paleocene) -- A primitive condylarth with rather low-crowned molars, probably ancestral to the phenacodontid condylarths.

Tetraclaenodon (mid-Paleocene) -- A more advanced Paleocene condylarth from the phenacodontid family, and almost certainly ancestral to all the perissodactyls (a different order). Long but unspecialized limbs; 5 toes on each foot (#1 and #5 smaller). Slightly more efficient wrist."

Notice the "probably" and "and almost certainly", those take it out of the realm of fact and put it into the realm of theory. Good try but, not in my court.

An Alabama Judge

[doc30]

Sorry, my / sarc did't come through in my post to you.

[baubau]

They may be fossils alright, but they're not transitional from apes to humans etc.

People see what they want to see in rocks.