Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
But, as far as the liberaltarians are concerned, there's really nothing in the Constitution that permits the federal government to "establish Justice" or "promote the general Welfare" and protect children from predators.

Yeah, because we all know there's a huge hand that comes forth out of computer monitors and straps kids in to watch porn.

Apparently, you guys never heard of NetNanny, CyberSitter or other parental controls provided by the lovely free market and want to blame society's failures on strawmen.

9 posted on 01/27/2007 11:05:36 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Forgot your tagline? Click here to have it resent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Apparently, you guys never heard of NetNanny, CyberSitter or other parental controls provided by the lovely free market

Filtering software on a computer is like a mechanical safety on a gun -- good thing to have, but you'd be a fool to trust it completely. For younger kids, (I don't have any of my own), I would use a white-list system -- Each stie they want to visit, each person they want to IM, each person they want to receive e-mail from, would have to be approved by me. And as other FReepers have mentioned, keep the computer in the living room or somewhere you can keep an eye on things.

I'd probably let a kid have a computer in his room at the age of 16 or so -- but with monitoring software installed, like a silent alarm, to ping me to anything fishy. By that age, they're only a couple of years away from college, and you won't be able to control what they look at in their dorm rooms.

14 posted on 01/27/2007 11:22:30 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson