Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin

Rep. Sensenbrenner made it very clear that he would not support any legislation that came from a conference committee that included an award of legal status to illegal aliens, as well as a path to citizenship for illegal aliens. Has was chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

Was this agreement made without his knowledge? Was it made without his consent?

In light of the opinions he expressed about a conference bill not including any path to citizenship, why did leadership appoint him to the conference committee?


118 posted on 01/27/2007 3:56:00 PM PST by arnoldpalmerfan (Tancredo for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: arnoldpalmerfan
The agreement was made in 2005, before the House bill was written. Whatever position that Sensenbrenner took is not totally irrelevant.

It is entirely possible(or maybe even likely) that the GOP thought that they could get around the dems/water down the bill by stacking the conference committee.

If so, that was a foolish assumption because the dems had fallen for that one to many times already. In fact, we see that Reid killed the Senate bill the first time around and refused to let it come up again until Frist named who would be representing the Senate in the Conference committee.

BTW, now that the dems are in charge, it is likely that they will be doing some retaliating and stacking a few conference committees.

119 posted on 01/27/2007 4:13:50 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson