Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: derlauerer

It shouldn't have taken any effort; it was too wordy, too full of famous names and too arrogantly immodest not to find a bit of fault in the end.


40 posted on 01/27/2007 1:26:47 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Old Professer
It shouldn't have taken any effort; it was too wordy,

On this point, I disagree completely: Any essay worth reading should be expected to require effort on the part of the reader. Furthermore, as you can probably tell from my posts to you, I actually enjoy reading (and writing) wordy documents. Precision is important, and I only embrace brevity (and only expect others to do so) if the exact meaning of the text is preserved.

I do not believe that the writer could have crafted his essay in a substantially smaller number of words.

too full of famous names and too arrogantly immodest not to find a bit of fault in the end.

As to these counts, I thought, while reading the essay, that the writer was using names in a justifiable way to make his arguments, and was in no way either arrogant or immodest. Clearly, we must agree to differ on these points.

46 posted on 01/27/2007 4:05:43 PM PST by derlauerer ("Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - N. Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson