Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ol' Sparky; All
Originally published on March 8, 2004

Why are you posting an article from 2004???

Recently while campaigning for Ralph Reed he said the following when asked by a reporter:

"I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, that it should remain that way, it should remain that way inviolate, and everything should be done to make sure that that's the case," Mr. Giuliani said in response to a reporter's question. "But I also believe that you should allow for the protection of legal rights for people who are gay and lesbian."

6 posted on 01/26/2007 12:34:21 PM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: areafiftyone

Pathetic.


9 posted on 01/26/2007 12:36:45 PM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

So, Rudy has flip-flopped on the issue in an effort to fool conservatives into thinking he opposes gay marriage?


10 posted on 01/26/2007 12:38:01 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Originally published on March 8, 2004 Why are you posting an article from 2004??? Recently while campaigning for Ralph Reed he said the following when asked by a reporter: "I believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman, that it should remain that way, it should remain that way inviolate, and everything should be done to make sure that that's the case," Mr. Giuliani said in response to a reporter's question. "But I also believe that you should allow for the protection of legal rights for people who are gay and lesbian."

That is good. I just hope that he doesn't mean by "legal rights" he is for confirming special rights for the rainbows.

11 posted on 01/26/2007 12:38:05 PM PST by frogjerk (REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone; Liz

Which Rudy are we to believe -- the one who pandered to the homosexuals in 2004, or the one who pandered to the conservative followers of Ralph Reed in 2006?


16 posted on 01/26/2007 12:40:06 PM PST by TommyDale (If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Why are you posting an article from 2004???

I guess the Swift boat veterans were out of line?

22 posted on 01/26/2007 12:42:43 PM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Why are you posting another one of his flip flops?

You rudy cheerleaders are a funny bunch.


27 posted on 01/26/2007 12:44:46 PM PST by flashbunny (If the founding fathers were alive today, they'd be plucking feathers and boiling tar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Why post an article from 2004? Because the Rudy-detractors want to misrepresent his positions on a whole number of issues.


164 posted on 01/26/2007 5:08:29 PM PST by My2Cents ("I support the right-ward most candidate who has a legitimate chance to win." -- W.F. Buckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson