As I pointed out earlier (read this really slowly so you get it this time), that 2004 statement on banning gay marriage posted on this thread was more about the inappropriateness of banning gay marriage at the federal level through constitutional amendment. A lot of Freepers were opposed to that approach. To use that 2004 quote to imply something about Giuliani's position on the issue is motivated either by dishonesty, or by stupidity. Which one are you?
It just shows how little either of you know about the Contitution...
READ it for yourself...
Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress;...
Just so we're clear, I'm not "implying" anything about Giuliani's positions, I'm stating them. He is a vocal advocate of special rights for homosexuals, a vocal advocate of gun control and a vocal advocate of unfettered abortion on demand, including partial birth abortion.
If you dispute those statements please provide the remarks in which he repudiated those positions. Don't try to pass off the "priorities have changed" or "nobody likes abortion" BS. No matter what anyone thinks of Mitt Romney's sincerity, he has unequivocally changed his positions and stated them. Let me see the Giuliani statements where he does the same.