I've gotten so tired of the proponents not using their brain
I personally find that to be insulting.
I want to know what happened and will entertain both parties descriptions. There are always 2 sides to a story. What I see at the moment is a he said/she said contest of legal bomb throwing with the word of 2 border patrol agents refuting the testimony from a drug dealer. I don't want my sister or my nephew to worry that she will lose her law enforcement husband and possibly be homeless, and my nephew fatherless like their families.
Whatever. my statements are a summary of what the BP agents have said. They aren't meant for drive-by posters, but for the people that have kept on top of things and have read all the articles and posted the BP agent's claims as gospel truth.
Those people would recognize that my statement accurately reflects what the BP agents claim happened.
They also will ignore my statements, because they don't have an answer to the question. In short, the story given to us by the BP agents does not make sense.
And if you think this is just a "he-said/she-said", you need to go back and read the numerous articles posted about this.
We would all like to have a videotape showing what happened that day. But there is a LOT MORE evidence than just the words spoken by three people. There's the bullet. There's the testimony of other agents involved. There's the shell casings. There's the official signed incident report from the agents. There's the van. There are the statements of the prosecuter.
What we DON'T seem to have is the actual transcript of the trial. I want to read that.