To: smonk
I read an article in the IEEE magazine just last night on this problem. It seems that the Germans and French were using two different versions of the same autocad program for the drawings which were not 100% compatible.
And on a similar related topic, the wiring in the aircraft is alumninum, not copper. I'm not an aerospace engineer, but every house and business is wired with copper, so that's good enough for me.
14 posted on
01/26/2007 8:04:35 AM PST by
par4
(If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything)
To: par4
another adaptation made because of weight; aluminum is lighter than copper. cheaper, too. and arguably more dangerous.
16 posted on
01/26/2007 8:10:54 AM PST by
smonk
To: par4
Aluminum wiring, for a while, was used in housing, however, it is less conductive and more likely to develop resistance at the connection point than copper. There were considerable problems with fires starting at connection points in houses.
http://members.tripod.com/~masterslic/FAQ-2/13.html
With more and more aircraft maintenance being done by third-parties, I can assure you that as critical as the aluminum wiring/connector issue is, third-party maintenance will not be able to address the need for detail. Ergo, when this problem and need for detail is addressed, the cost of maintenance will rise on the A380 fleet.
17 posted on
01/26/2007 8:16:25 AM PST by
Puckster
To: par4
[...the wiring in the aircraft is alumninum, not copper.]
Aluminum weighs less then copper which must be the reason for its use on the A380. Unfortunately, it causes fires, and shouldn't be used in homes or others places that need to be kept safe.
51 posted on
02/05/2007 10:23:13 AM PST by
backbencher
(Nancy Pelosi sends her regards to the non-voting "real conservatives".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson