Skip to comments.
Plan for superhighway
ripped as 'urban legend'
Worldnetdaily.com ^
| January 26, 2007
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 01/26/2007 6:42:51 AM PST by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
To: mysterio
They can get good manufacturing jobs as soon as we revoke NAFTA. I think 50% of the population once worked on farms. You think 50% can get manufacturing jobs now?
You know that manufacturing jobs increased after NAFTA? Or didn't you see that while you were surfing the Public Citizen site? LOL!
81
posted on
01/26/2007 6:57:33 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I think it's a question of if the helicopters belong to a top secret, UN or NAU type organization. As I recall (and the black helicopter thing has been around for at least 12 years, starting about the time of Waco), the only person ever to imply that black helicopters belonged to a secret UN conspiracy trying to take over the world was a radio talk show personality who generally dismisses the idea of conspiracies. Those who mistakenly -- in his half-brained opinion -- believe the Randy Weaver incident, the Branch Davidian massacre, the downing of TWA Flt 800, or the strange deaths surrounding Bill Clinton were more than just ordinary happenings are labeled "Keepers Of Odd Knowledge" by this self-professed revealer of all truth with his mind "on loan from G-O-D."
Besides which, everyone should know that UN helicopters, like their APCs and tanks, are uniformly painted white with bold black lettering.
To: mysterio
I said good paying manufacturing jobs. You've said lots of things with nothing to back you up.
You going to show that manufacturing wages dropped since NAFTA? Now that you've admitted that the number of jobs didn't shrink.
83
posted on
01/26/2007 6:59:54 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
You still don't know what happened in Mexico at that time, do you? Poor ignorant little man.
Yes, I know about the economic crisis that happened. But now it's fixed, thanks to NAFTA, right? Well, not really. It took a big bailout loan to stop it.
84
posted on
01/26/2007 7:01:58 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
Yes, I know about the economic crisis that happened. What caused the crisis? Could that be why their wages fell? LOL!
But now it's fixed, thanks to NAFTA, right?
Reducing their trade with the US will help Mexico's economy, right?
85
posted on
01/26/2007 7:05:23 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
The area where I live has been a casualty. We've lost several factories to Mexico or to globalization. Not everyone lost money, though. The group of consultants that organized the restructuring gave themselves millions as a reward.
In your defense, wages in manufacturing have kept up with wages in general. However, productivity has skyrocketed, and the increase in wages does not reflect that increase in productivity.
The ability of any manufacturing facility to threaten to pick up and outsource has removed a lot of the bargaining power workers used to have. But I'll admit, that's the new global economy, and until workers in the cheap labor countries demand better compensation, we're going to see more of the same.
After a couple of hours of perusing charts, I have to concede that if we protected worker's wages in America, we would be able to export even less since the rest of the world isn't following suit. Cheap labor is a reality.
It's just that not everyone is college material, and the new economy is making a college degree as essential as the high school degree was 20 years ago. Therefore, a college degree is now worth less, and those who would have gone into good paying manufacturing jobs are now going to demand that someone pay for them to go to college. Taxpayers will pick up that tab.
It's unavoidable, though. At least my job isn't wading through economic data. My eyes are about ready to pop out of my head from all the charts. If that's what you do for a living, you have my respect for it, lol.
86
posted on
01/26/2007 8:29:49 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: Toddsterpatriot
Reducing their trade with the US will help Mexico's economy, right?
Probably not, but increasing workers' salaries might. A population of broke people don't contribute much to a healthy economy.
And also in your defense, foreign investment probably helped reverse the crash.
87
posted on
01/26/2007 8:42:56 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
So much for NAFTA killing all our high paying jobs. (That's 1982 dollars)
|
Change Output Options: |
From: |
|
To: |
|
|
|
|
include graphs NEW! |
|
|
Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)
Series Id: CES3000000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector: Manufacturing
Industry: Manufacturing
NAICS Code: N/A
Data Type: ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS
|
Year |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Annual |
1994 |
16853 |
16862 |
16896 |
16932 |
16962 |
17011 |
17027 |
17082 |
17114 |
17144 |
17187 |
17218 |
|
1995 |
17259 |
17264 |
17263 |
17278 |
17260 |
17250 |
17218 |
17241 |
17246 |
17215 |
17207 |
17230 |
|
1996 |
17206 |
17229 |
17192 |
17204 |
17221 |
17226 |
17222 |
17255 |
17253 |
17268 |
17276 |
17285 |
|
1997 |
17298 |
17316 |
17339 |
17351 |
17362 |
17387 |
17387 |
17451 |
17466 |
17513 |
17555 |
17587 |
|
1998 |
17621 |
17627 |
17637 |
17636 |
17624 |
17607 |
17421 |
17564 |
17558 |
17512 |
17466 |
17449 |
|
1999 |
17426 |
17394 |
17368 |
17342 |
17333 |
17294 |
17319 |
17288 |
17281 |
17275 |
17283 |
17277 |
|
2000 |
17285 |
17285 |
17302 |
17299 |
17276 |
17297 |
17325 |
17287 |
17232 |
17215 |
17204 |
17181 |
|
|
After 7 full years of NAFTA, manufacturing jobs were higher. So much for NAFTA killing all our manufacturing jobs.
88
posted on
01/26/2007 8:54:32 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: mysterio
Probably not, but increasing workers' salaries might. A population of broke people don't contribute much to a healthy economy. Maybe if they bought more expensive stuff their salaries would miraculously increase? LOL!
And also in your defense, foreign investment probably helped reverse the crash.
Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks? You think just maybe foreign investment helps our economy grow?
89
posted on
01/26/2007 9:04:33 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: 1rudeboy
" One would think that you'd have learned that from your protectionist colleagues by now."
Is it protectionist to want what you, and your forefathers, have worked for? What you, and your forefathers, have fought in wars for?
I'm all for free trade. But I'm NOT for giving it all away. It should be a level playing field, or none at all.
:O)
P
90
posted on
01/26/2007 10:15:55 PM PST
by
papasmurf
(Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
To: Toddsterpatriot
NAFTA sucks.
I'm sorry, I have no links with which to bolster my claim.
The only document I have, that might help, is my micro retirement account. Oh, and the ever increasing number of illegal miscreants crossing our borders each year.
I hope you understand.
:O)
P
91
posted on
01/26/2007 10:24:46 PM PST
by
papasmurf
(Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Does that take into account the legal and illegal increase in population?
I thought not.
:O)
P
92
posted on
01/26/2007 10:26:34 PM PST
by
papasmurf
(Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
To: C210N
How about this. No one is talking about it. Its on a government web site
http://www.spp.gov/
To sum it up. No boarders between US, Mexico and Canada. Now we know why the politicians do not care.
To: mysterio
All so we can save 50 cents on veggies and get the hammer for $7 instead of $10.Yeah, but they will throw in the sickle for free...
94
posted on
01/27/2007 12:08:25 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: C210N
There is no SPP...move along now...nothing to see...
/jedi mindtricks
95
posted on
01/27/2007 12:16:02 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
(Rudy is Hillary, in drag, with more personal baggage.)
To: C210N
The general subject is transportation, yes? How many millions of people fly in commercial jets per year? How much traffic moves every day? How much marine traffic every month? It's a BUSY world.
Instead of arguing over a relatively small transport corridor, why not think BIG, like a world wide mag-lev train network? Big jets can carry only limited payloads and the energy cost per mile per pound is HIGH. Steel wheels on rails are much cheaper than rubber tires on pavement, and ships are cheaper still.
A mag-lev train has virtually no loss in lift and EM drag REDUCES with increasing velocity(the sheath effect). A mag-lev train can be MILES long vs the short jumbo jet. As they can travel at up to 300+mph they HAVE to be on raised pylons, like monorails.
Bullet trains have long been in operation in france and japan, and the europeans have an extensive railroad network that runs like clockwork. And yet out own amtrak is slowly going out of business. If there ever was a time to consider mag-lev trains as the future of ground transportation, now is the moment. Why not a mag-lev RR line from tierra del fuego to point barrow, to the chunnel? THINK BIG!
96
posted on
01/27/2007 12:57:53 AM PST
by
timer
(n/0=n=nx0)
To: mysterio
Alot of that output has come through modernization and robotics. The same thing would happen right now in the US if Nafta went away. Your high barriers to entry into manufacturing are either Labor, or technological. Techno and Robotics is getting cheaper because of benefits. Plus you don't have workers screwing up production lines.
To: papasmurf
It should be a level playing field, or none at all. I completely agree. The problem is, when you enter into an agreement that essentially says, "I won't tax you if you won't tax me," it doesn't matter. You'll always have some populist demagogue (on the Left or Right, it doesn't matter--in this regard they are nearly identical) standing in front of a shuttered factory and crying, "waah, it's not fair!" And then you have otherwise reasonable people chiming in, "well, I'm in favor of fairness." The process will never stop, even if we move to either a 100% libertarian free-market model, or a 100% statist protectionist model.
98
posted on
01/27/2007 4:47:09 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Sprite518
"No one is talking about it [the SPP]."
Get real. Rarely a day passes when we don't talk about it. Maybe you meant to say, "no one is saying what I want to hear about it?"
99
posted on
01/27/2007 4:54:33 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: EternalVigilance
There is no SPP...move along now...nothing to see.... Do you realize that your response was directed to someone who posted a link to the SPP website? ROTFLMAO
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson