Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plan for superhighway ripped as 'urban legend'
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | January 26, 2007 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 01/26/2007 6:42:51 AM PST by Paul Ross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last
To: mysterio
They can get good manufacturing jobs as soon as we revoke NAFTA.

I think 50% of the population once worked on farms. You think 50% can get manufacturing jobs now?

You know that manufacturing jobs increased after NAFTA? Or didn't you see that while you were surfing the Public Citizen site? LOL!

81 posted on 01/26/2007 6:57:33 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I think it's a question of if the helicopters belong to a top secret, UN or NAU type organization. As I recall (and the black helicopter thing has been around for at least 12 years, starting about the time of Waco), the only person ever to imply that black helicopters belonged to a secret UN conspiracy trying to take over the world was a radio talk show personality who generally dismisses the idea of conspiracies. Those who mistakenly -- in his half-brained opinion -- believe the Randy Weaver incident, the Branch Davidian massacre, the downing of TWA Flt 800, or the strange deaths surrounding Bill Clinton were more than just ordinary happenings are labeled "Keepers Of Odd Knowledge" by this self-professed revealer of all truth with his mind "on loan from G-O-D."

Besides which, everyone should know that UN helicopters, like their APCs and tanks, are uniformly painted white with bold black lettering.

82 posted on 01/26/2007 6:59:17 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
I said good paying manufacturing jobs.

You've said lots of things with nothing to back you up.

You going to show that manufacturing wages dropped since NAFTA? Now that you've admitted that the number of jobs didn't shrink.

83 posted on 01/26/2007 6:59:54 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You still don't know what happened in Mexico at that time, do you? Poor ignorant little man.

Yes, I know about the economic crisis that happened. But now it's fixed, thanks to NAFTA, right? Well, not really. It took a big bailout loan to stop it.
84 posted on 01/26/2007 7:01:58 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Yes, I know about the economic crisis that happened.

What caused the crisis? Could that be why their wages fell? LOL!

But now it's fixed, thanks to NAFTA, right?

Reducing their trade with the US will help Mexico's economy, right?

85 posted on 01/26/2007 7:05:23 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot


The area where I live has been a casualty. We've lost several factories to Mexico or to globalization. Not everyone lost money, though. The group of consultants that organized the restructuring gave themselves millions as a reward.

In your defense, wages in manufacturing have kept up with wages in general. However, productivity has skyrocketed, and the increase in wages does not reflect that increase in productivity.



The ability of any manufacturing facility to threaten to pick up and outsource has removed a lot of the bargaining power workers used to have. But I'll admit, that's the new global economy, and until workers in the cheap labor countries demand better compensation, we're going to see more of the same.

After a couple of hours of perusing charts, I have to concede that if we protected worker's wages in America, we would be able to export even less since the rest of the world isn't following suit. Cheap labor is a reality.

It's just that not everyone is college material, and the new economy is making a college degree as essential as the high school degree was 20 years ago. Therefore, a college degree is now worth less, and those who would have gone into good paying manufacturing jobs are now going to demand that someone pay for them to go to college. Taxpayers will pick up that tab.

It's unavoidable, though. At least my job isn't wading through economic data. My eyes are about ready to pop out of my head from all the charts. If that's what you do for a living, you have my respect for it, lol.
86 posted on 01/26/2007 8:29:49 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Reducing their trade with the US will help Mexico's economy, right?

Probably not, but increasing workers' salaries might. A population of broke people don't contribute much to a healthy economy.



And also in your defense, foreign investment probably helped reverse the crash.


87 posted on 01/26/2007 8:42:56 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

So much for NAFTA killing all our high paying jobs. (That's 1982 dollars)

Skip Navigation Links   Latest Numbers
DOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imageryý copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
 www.bls.gov  Advanced Search | A-Z Index
Change Output Options: From:   To:     
include graphs NEW!
Data extracted on: January 26, 2007 (11:49:56 PM)
Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)

Series Id:     CES3000000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector:  Manufacturing
Industry:      Manufacturing
NAICS Code:    N/A
Data Type:     ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1994 16853 16862 16896 16932 16962 17011 17027 17082 17114 17144 17187 17218  
1995 17259 17264 17263 17278 17260 17250 17218 17241 17246 17215 17207 17230  
1996 17206 17229 17192 17204 17221 17226 17222 17255 17253 17268 17276 17285  
1997 17298 17316 17339 17351 17362 17387 17387 17451 17466 17513 17555 17587  
1998 17621 17627 17637 17636 17624 17607 17421 17564 17558 17512 17466 17449  
1999 17426 17394 17368 17342 17333 17294 17319 17288 17281 17275 17283 17277  
2000 17285 17285 17302 17299 17276 17297 17325 17287 17232 17215 17204 17181  

 

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Postal Square Building
2 Massachusetts Ave., NE
Washington, DC 20212-0001

Phone: (202) 691-5200
Fax-on-demand: (202) 691-6325
Do you have a Data question?
Do you have a Technical (web) question?
Do you have Other comments?

After 7 full years of NAFTA, manufacturing jobs were higher. So much for NAFTA killing all our manufacturing jobs.

88 posted on 01/26/2007 8:54:32 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Probably not, but increasing workers' salaries might. A population of broke people don't contribute much to a healthy economy.

Maybe if they bought more expensive stuff their salaries would miraculously increase? LOL!

And also in your defense, foreign investment probably helped reverse the crash.

Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks? You think just maybe foreign investment helps our economy grow?

89 posted on 01/26/2007 9:04:33 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

" One would think that you'd have learned that from your protectionist colleagues by now."

Is it protectionist to want what you, and your forefathers, have worked for? What you, and your forefathers, have fought in wars for?

I'm all for free trade. But I'm NOT for giving it all away. It should be a level playing field, or none at all.


:O)

P


90 posted on 01/26/2007 10:15:55 PM PST by papasmurf (Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

NAFTA sucks.

I'm sorry, I have no links with which to bolster my claim.

The only document I have, that might help, is my micro retirement account. Oh, and the ever increasing number of illegal miscreants crossing our borders each year.

I hope you understand.


:O)

P


91 posted on 01/26/2007 10:24:46 PM PST by papasmurf (Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Does that take into account the legal and illegal increase in population?


I thought not.

:O)

P
92 posted on 01/26/2007 10:26:34 PM PST by papasmurf (Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: C210N
How about this. No one is talking about it. Its on a government web site

http://www.spp.gov/

To sum it up. No boarders between US, Mexico and Canada. Now we know why the politicians do not care.
93 posted on 01/26/2007 11:47:39 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
All so we can save 50 cents on veggies and get the hammer for $7 instead of $10.

Yeah, but they will throw in the sickle for free...

94 posted on 01/27/2007 12:08:25 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: C210N

There is no SPP...move along now...nothing to see...


/jedi mindtricks


95 posted on 01/27/2007 12:16:02 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Rudy is Hillary, in drag, with more personal baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C210N

The general subject is transportation, yes? How many millions of people fly in commercial jets per year? How much traffic moves every day? How much marine traffic every month? It's a BUSY world.

Instead of arguing over a relatively small transport corridor, why not think BIG, like a world wide mag-lev train network? Big jets can carry only limited payloads and the energy cost per mile per pound is HIGH. Steel wheels on rails are much cheaper than rubber tires on pavement, and ships are cheaper still.

A mag-lev train has virtually no loss in lift and EM drag REDUCES with increasing velocity(the sheath effect). A mag-lev train can be MILES long vs the short jumbo jet. As they can travel at up to 300+mph they HAVE to be on raised pylons, like monorails.

Bullet trains have long been in operation in france and japan, and the europeans have an extensive railroad network that runs like clockwork. And yet out own amtrak is slowly going out of business. If there ever was a time to consider mag-lev trains as the future of ground transportation, now is the moment. Why not a mag-lev RR line from tierra del fuego to point barrow, to the chunnel? THINK BIG!


96 posted on 01/27/2007 12:57:53 AM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Alot of that output has come through modernization and robotics. The same thing would happen right now in the US if Nafta went away. Your high barriers to entry into manufacturing are either Labor, or technological. Techno and Robotics is getting cheaper because of benefits. Plus you don't have workers screwing up production lines.


97 posted on 01/27/2007 1:43:24 AM PST by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf
It should be a level playing field, or none at all.

I completely agree. The problem is, when you enter into an agreement that essentially says, "I won't tax you if you won't tax me," it doesn't matter. You'll always have some populist demagogue (on the Left or Right, it doesn't matter--in this regard they are nearly identical) standing in front of a shuttered factory and crying, "waah, it's not fair!" And then you have otherwise reasonable people chiming in, "well, I'm in favor of fairness." The process will never stop, even if we move to either a 100% libertarian free-market model, or a 100% statist protectionist model.

98 posted on 01/27/2007 4:47:09 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
"No one is talking about it [the SPP]."

Get real. Rarely a day passes when we don't talk about it. Maybe you meant to say, "no one is saying what I want to hear about it?"

99 posted on 01/27/2007 4:54:33 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
There is no SPP...move along now...nothing to see....

Do you realize that your response was directed to someone who posted a link to the SPP website? ROTFLMAO

100 posted on 01/27/2007 4:56:24 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson