Skip to comments.
Reporter bucks Army to defend craft
Capital Times ^
| Jan. 25, 2007
| John Nichols
Posted on 01/25/2007 4:26:29 PM PST by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
prosecutors do not want to provide Watada with an open forum in which to explain his arguments against the war.
No, their job is to prosecute him, not to provide a forum ala the progressive Abby Hoffman.
When you force a journalist to participate, you run the risk of turning the journalist into an investigative tool of the state
I've some sympathy for this arguement, but when push comes to shove, citizens have an obligation to testify. Irrespective of their profession. Employees testify against their employers, police testify against their informants, doctors testify against patients. Sarah Olson isn't a Priest and this wasn't a confession.
Watada has made similar statements in a number of public settings.
Which makes her refusal a public non-issue, only important to the extent the prosecution can document these "similar statement". My guess, they can't, at least not with the credibility of Sarah Olson.
1
posted on
01/25/2007 4:26:30 PM PST
by
SJackson
To: SJackson
When the Bush administration decided to ignore questions from veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas with presidential press secretaries and their aides going out of their way to try to isolate and discredit her for failing to practice stenography to power the remainder of the press corps was for the most part silent.Either this sentence is very poorly written, or I'm sleeping with my eyes open. I don't know what it says. And, pleeeeease, no pictures of that vicious old lady Thomas.
2
posted on
01/25/2007 4:30:16 PM PST
by
hsalaw
To: SJackson
If there is a demand for the services of these unemployed reporters, they could start their own paper and beat the pants off the competition. If there is a demand for their service, they could prove it to an investor, even Soros, who would finance them.
That they are not starting their own papers is proof that either a) they are not competent at their craft of journalism or b) there is no demand for their type of journalism. and c) they don't understand the realities of economics.
To: hsalaw
I 2nd that no pictures of Helen....
4
posted on
01/25/2007 4:33:07 PM PST
by
Kimmers
(It's not what you take when you leave this world behind, it's what you leave behind when you go)
To: SJackson
These crybabies. If you can't freelance and make REAL money (which is why I am now 'unemployed' and making more than ever), you don't deserve the name writer.
5
posted on
01/25/2007 4:33:46 PM PST
by
Amalie
(FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
To: hsalaw
When I see her name I look the other way, in anticipation of the pictures. This is a Progressive paper, they consider answering Helen Thomas' questions an obligation of the office. I think the President could throw her out.
6
posted on
01/25/2007 4:33:48 PM PST
by
SJackson
(Let a thousand flowers bloom and let all our rifles be aimed at the occupation, Abu Mazen 1/11/07)
To: SJackson
Isn't he confined? Pre-trial like?
7
posted on
01/25/2007 4:34:14 PM PST
by
leadpenny
To: Diana in Wisconsin
You'lll laugh at this one.
8
posted on
01/25/2007 4:34:39 PM PST
by
SJackson
(Let a thousand flowers bloom and let all our rifles be aimed at the occupation, Abu Mazen 1/11/07)
To: SJackson
"...The people who own the nation's communications combines are, for the most part, so risk-averse and so obsessed with their bottom lines that they are making it impossible for serious reporters to do their jobs." Here is a solution for you poor, misunderstood "serious reporters".
Scrape up a couple of hundred million dollars and make a tender offer for a large newspaper. Then you can print any lefty crap you want.
But in the meantime, "He who pays the piper calls the tune!"
9
posted on
01/25/2007 4:43:20 PM PST
by
albee
(Okay. so he missed aThe best thing you can do for the poor is.....not be one of them. - Eric Hoffer)
To: SJackson
but a reassertion of the founding principle that a free press is the essential underpinning of democracy.The Press. Is. The Problem.
10
posted on
01/25/2007 4:52:16 PM PST
by
RedQuill
To: SJackson
"When you force a journalist to participate, you run the risk of turning the journalist into an investigative tool of the state."...Instead of merely a tool of the anti-war left.
11
posted on
01/25/2007 4:55:23 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Iran is in the IED exporting business. Time to shut them down.)
To: SJackson
The Telecommunications Act of 1996, with its encouragement of media consolidation and homogenization, has provoked a marked decline in the diversity and quality of broadcast news.Amazing. Fox News came on the scene in late 1996.
No wonder the Libs bitch and moan.
12
posted on
01/25/2007 5:04:08 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: SJackson
impossible for serious reporters to do their jobs. This implys that are non serious reporters working now, which I find hard to argue with.
13
posted on
01/25/2007 5:07:51 PM PST
by
razorback-bert
(Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
To: hsalaw
You wrote:
"When the Bush administration decided to ignore questions from veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas with presidential press secretaries and their aides going out of their way to try to isolate and discredit her for failing to practice stenography to power the remainder of the press corps was for the most part silent.""Either this sentence is very poorly written, or I'm sleeping with my eyes open. I don't know what it says. And, pleeeeease, no pictures of that vicious old lady Thomas.
Try to think of it as a counter weight that functions to keep your screen from scrolling all the way to the bottom.
Senper Fi
An Old Man
14
posted on
01/25/2007 5:19:04 PM PST
by
An Old Man
(USMC 1956 1960)
To: SJackson; Milhous; CGVet58; CasearianDaoist; headsonpikes; beyond the sea; E.G.C.; ...
"It's a journalist's job to report the news, not to participate in government prosecutions. The press cannot function if it is used by the government to prosecute political speech, and hauling a journalist into a military court erodes the separation between government and press. Turning reporters into the investigative arm of the government subverts press freedoms and chills dissenting speech in the United States." The claim here is that "The News" identifies itself to journalists, who have no motive other than to reveal that NEWS to the people. The reality is that Half the truth is often a great lie. - Benjamin Franklin
The News does not spring full-grown from Athena's brow, human beings - under warrant of the Constitution - have the freedom to decide what they are going to report, and what they will not report. Presumptively, therefore, journalism is politics. Neither more nor less.
15
posted on
01/25/2007 5:24:51 PM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: SJackson
"Watada has volunteered to serve in Afghanistan, where he believes that U.S. troops are participating in "an unambiguous war linked to the Sept. 11 attacks."
If the war in Afghanistan is a legitimately declared war, so is the war in Iraq. Both are really just theaters of operation in the war with Islamofascists.
Watada cannot say that one is legitimately declared and the other is not, at least not with any rational person accepting it as a serious argument.
To: hsalaw
...I'm sorry, what's the bad news here?
The MSM is getting it's long coming kick to the jimmy with a steel toed, pointed boot. I'm pretty happy about this.
Gone are the days where they're oh so important they can lord over the rest of us.
17
posted on
01/25/2007 5:56:26 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: marktwain
Just send him to Afghanistan and the problem is solved?
To: SJackson
The first commissioned officer in the U.S. armed forces to formally refuse deployment in George Bush's war,......I stopped reading here.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
20
posted on
01/26/2007 3:01:30 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson