WHAT?? You're the one who posted that article, not me.
"YOU are claiming that the modifying phrase is more valid than the subject"
THE COURTS are claiming that this "modifying phrase" is part of the second amendment. YOU, on the other hand, are completely ignoring the phrase, saying that the second amendment means exactly the same thing with or without it.
And any court which claims the 2A is a collective right (I must have missed some of those decisions) is using modern dogma to interpret clear prose in a nefarious way.