You claim to be a Rush fan, but apparently you are a selective fan. Rush has spoken at length regarding the religion of secular humanism. It means something to him , but not to his fan, huh?
Your circular babble is a veiled form of adhominem attack; you are attempting to make cott look foolish, and thereby discredit his ideas. It won't work; you are transparent.
I am familiar with "secular humanism". The secular humanists intentionally obfuscate the distinction between "secular humanism" and "theistic humanism" in an attempt to have it both ways. I'm not fooled by or impressed with the tactic, nor am I willing to overlook you and cottshop engaging in the same exercise in sophistry because "they're doing it too".