Some irony in the fact that you link leads to the Border Patrol agent's union website.
And what? You think FrontPage Magazine's article has been altered by the Border Patrol union for their website?
I can understand that you would prefer to argue the red herring of where it is posted rather than the inconvenient substance of the information in FrontPage Magazine's article. Its content puts the lie to what you have been peddling:
"The prosecutorial caricature proved so transparent local media rapidly saw through it. The (Ontario, CA) Daily Bulletin provided outstanding coverage of all aspects of the trial, reporting:
[A]n Office of Inspector General memorandum obtained by the Daily Bulletin Tuesday contradicts [Prosecutor] Sutton's claim that Ramos and Compean reported Aldrete-Davila was unarmed. The memorandum of activity was written April 4, 2005, by Christopher Sanchez, the OIG investigator who questioned Compean about the Feb. 17, 2005, shooting. Sanchez was the same agent who went to Mexico to interview Aldrete-Davila, according to documents obtained by the newspaper.
The Sanchez memo notes:
Compean said that Aldrete-Davila continued to look back over his shoulder towards Compean as Aldrete-Davila ran away from him. Compean said that he began to shoot at Aldrete-Davila because of the shiny object he thought he saw in Aldrete-Davila's hand and because Aldrete-Davila continued to look back towards his direction. Compean explained that he thought the shiny object might be a gun and that Aldrete-Davila was going to shoot at him because he kept looking back at him..."
Here, see if you can weasel out of this link.
That should be easier for you than trying to dispute the substance of the article:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=26224