Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chena
I understand but they must look at everyone as being potentially dangerous. I thinking firing should have been the maximal punishment. As I mentioned earlier I don't know if these guys were Rambos or excellent agents that got caught in a bad situation and panicked. I'm thinking more the later though because they didn't cover well at all. How hard would it have been for them to say he had a gun in his pants and turned to fire? Who would have known the difference? Instead they go and do something stupid like hide shells.
246 posted on 01/24/2007 12:15:09 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: CindyDawg

Personally, I think the reason these guys tried to coverup what they had done is because they knew that what they had just done was illegal. That is the only reason I can think of as to why they would have "panicked" in the first place. From what I have learned, B.P. agents have cause to fire their weapons often throughout the year, and some of those situations have ended with the suspect being killed. And yet none of those B.P. agents faced charges nor reprimands, etc., because they followed the law and the procedures in place for reporting such events.

You said, "How hard would it have been for t hem to say he had a gun in his pants and turned to fire? Who would have known the difference?" Yes, I suppose if they could have come up with a better lie. However, is that what we want our law enforcement officers to do? Become good liars?

These two agents had a reason for getting rid of the evidence. That fact alone should speak volumes.


264 posted on 01/24/2007 12:28:23 PM PST by Chena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson