What does a motion in limine have to do with secrecy? I file them all the time in cases, as does every single attorney that tries a case. It is a mere evidentiary ruling.
Let's see:
Can't introduce information about the drug smuggler (whose testimony is the sole basis for the prosecution's case).
Can't introduce evidence about the immunity given to the drug smuggler.
Can't introduce evidence about the border environment and violence.
Can't introduce evidence that Aldrete-Davila first claimed that he was shot while ENTERING the United States, as opposed to fleeing from a van filled with a million dollars worth of marijuana.
So much for a FAIR trial!
A permissible inference of conspiracy is allowed from even the most common court evidentiary filings.