Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DainBramage

Kids are different. An innocent person would have no reason to flee law enforcement.


16 posted on 01/24/2007 6:03:00 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Fleeing law enforcement is defiance of the law.


17 posted on 01/24/2007 6:03:22 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

So the death penalty includes failure to stop.... like Cuba, or Nazi Germany.


21 posted on 01/24/2007 6:10:11 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
An innocent person would have no reason to flee law enforcement.

These border cops were found by the jury to have lied and destroyed evidence, so I will turn it back to you: An innocent cop has no reason to lie or destroy evidence.

And really, the argument is a slippery slope even beyond that. For example, one could say with equal validity that an innocent person would have no reason to fear unannounced warrantless searches of their homes and property. Or that an innocent person would have no reason to fear tracking devices and speed monitors being put into every automobile.

203 posted on 01/24/2007 11:30:52 AM PST by shempy (EABOF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson