Posted on 01/24/2007 5:51:23 AM PST by NapkinUser
If a cop had even reportedly shot a citizen in this manner, this thread would be 1000 posts long calling for the cops heads on a platter or worse.
Hypocrites abound.
It is lawful, even in NYS, for even a citizen to shoot a fleeing felon.
By allowing this travesty of justice to occur he has lost his base. It is a shame because I had high hopes for this presidency. Bush may be a decent man, but at this point he is wholly ineffective as a leader. If he does not begin to effectively lead this country, then the odds of a Republican being elected in 2008 are nill.
Considering the agents tried to cover it up, she should keep her mouth shut and pray for a pardon. These agents picked up their shells, and never reported the incident. Granted, the sentence was harsh, but insulting the president will get this woman nothing.
Please link me to evidence that the smuggler was unarmed.
"By allowing this travesty of justice to occur he has lost his base."
If Bush's "base" is made up of folks who think it's good to shoot a fleeing man in the back then lie and do away with evidence to cover it up, his base is everything DU says and worse.
Source?
"Please link me to evidence that the smuggler was unarmed."
That'd be nice wouldn't it? Why don't you link me to evidence that he WAS armed?
"Is" is not a preposition. It is a verb.
Where did you find the information regarding the testimony of the convicted agents and the agents that arrived later?
ping
If you were (maybe you are) a BP agent, that chases drug smugglers, wouldn't it be reasonable to believe they might be armed?
As I stated in another thread, it is mindboggling that the trial testimony has not been posted on the web. So many people are demanding "justice" for these agents, yet noone knows the "facts" of the case, as per the trial testimony, because noone has said "I was there and this is what he testified." If the testimony is so favorable to the BP agents' defense, then why has it not been posted for all to see by their attorneys?
Is there a contest for kooky posts going on here at FR that I don't know anything about?
Again, that is NOT THE ISSUE! The issue is that:
1) They failed to report the incident
2) The ACTIVELY OBSTRUCTED the investigation
3) They lied about the incident ocurring in the first place
If they had walked into their superior's office and said: "Sarge, we were confronted by an armed person who threatened us and then fled on foot, leaving a van behind with 750 lbs of dope. We fired when he menaced us, and we think we may have shot him in the a_s." If they had done that, NOTHING aside from maybe some minor investigation re: whether or not who fired first.
As it was, they attempted to defraud the courts and the investigative process. Although they don't deserve 10 years in prison imo, they are not the innocent and true blue defenders of God and our sovereign nation that the apoplectics here keep bellowing about. There is NO reason for spinning this as some kind of treasonous abandonment of border patrol officers if you are not alread carrying a huge anti hispanic sentiment on your back to begin with.
Oh, and by the way, I think it was also despicable to grant amnesty and bring a drug dealer back across the border to testify in the trial. That said, it doesn't excuse these two.
I was amazed that the president proposed his health care tax increase last night.
And these border agents in jail is a travesty.
And his unwillingness to defend his administration's position in Iraq except on an occasional basis.
There was plenty of ammo to defend WMDs, terrorist within Iraq, Iranian attacks on the US, Good News from our Troops, etc., etc.,
But, not once did any of that get put out in the public domain and vigorously defended.
Did he just give up???
...and not just your opinion, it is an ancient concept of our common law, that is, until the Super Senate (aka the Supreme Court) found the use of deadly force is a "seizure" and that felons are protected from such by the 4th amendment.
I would be inclined to believe the agents and support them were it not for their despicable behavior in attempting to cover up the incident and lying about until they were caught.
I listened to agent on Fox say there was more to story like the 2 guys shot the guy in the back (guy had no gun) hid evidence and then lied about the shooting and evidence so might be hard to pardon when there are these facts to consider no?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.