To: broncoholic
2 posted on
01/24/2007 5:46:28 AM PST by
TommyDale
(If we don't put a stop to this global warming, we will all be dead in 10,000 years!)
To: broncoholic
No surprises and one lame excuse. How many hours of attention will this non-story gather?
3 posted on
01/24/2007 5:48:19 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
To: broncoholic
So how long until the new prosecutor assigned to the 'case' drops the whole thing?
5 posted on
01/24/2007 5:49:38 AM PST by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: broncoholic
It certainly makes one wonder how many other cases he's ramrodded through and ruined innocent people's lives.
6 posted on
01/24/2007 5:51:21 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: broncoholic
May the case against Nifong, be handled equally as justly, honestly, unbiasedly, legally, properly and as fairly as Nifong was treating the Duke Lacrosse players.
May he be made an example to other DA's who look upon the Justice System as a game created for the sole purpose of tickling the Egos of prosecutors.
8 posted on
01/24/2007 6:08:35 AM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(Fear of destroying those openly committed to destroying you, indicates a suicidal self loathing.)
To: Howlin
nifong recusal letter link
9 posted on
01/24/2007 6:10:13 AM PST by
DvdMom
(Impeach Nifong -)
To: broncoholic
"I was not able prior to this week to discuss these [conflict of interest] developments with the victim because of the precariousness of her personal health due to complications in her pregnancy," Nifong wrote.
Victim? I think in his heart and mind he means "perpetrator" and not victim.
11 posted on
01/24/2007 6:16:28 AM PST by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: broncoholic
I seem to recall a judge ordering a dna test on the accusers baby. Whatever became of that?
12 posted on
01/24/2007 6:26:58 AM PST by
sportutegrl
(This thread is useless without pix.)
To: broncoholic
"So long, it's been good to know ya'..."
14 posted on
01/24/2007 6:45:23 AM PST by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: broncoholic; All; Howlin; Jezebelle; abb
The article states that Nifong's letter was addressed to Jim Coman, the man to whom AG Roy Cooper has now assigned the case for prosecution or other disposition.
Coman and Nifong have a prior relationship, as they were once prosecutorial co-workers. Is that not at least a POTENTIAL conflict of interest worthy of consideration?
Why was Nifong's letter not addressed to Mr. Cooper himself?
Was there some secret handshake by which the case was predetermined to be given to Coman?
Was Nifong aware of any such development?
It sure seems likely...and improper...and possibly unethical in and of itself.
This whole thing continues to stink to high heaven, and further exposes the widespread corruption within the NC justice system.
I am going to be sick...
15 posted on
01/24/2007 6:48:59 AM PST by
Guilty by Association
(Stop the Durham FARCE perpetrated by the FRAUD Attorney!)
To: broncoholic
The AG should have wrote him back, "You broke it, you bought it."
21 posted on
01/24/2007 7:30:21 AM PST by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Championship U)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson