Posted on 01/24/2007 12:42:24 AM PST by George Maschke
Eighteen House Republicans have urged the Justice Department to proceed with a polygraph test for Samuel R. Berger, the former national security adviser who agreed to take the test as part of a plea of guilty of stealing documents from the National Archives.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
While polygraphs may make for good political theater, they are a poor way of attempting to determine the truth. The Justice Department did well in choosing not to depend upon polygraph results in this case.
Even if they can't get him into the chair, they should scream
to the rafters about it.
Part One:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5meTECUBSAU
Part Two:
If Rice or Cheney had stolen damaging documents, the democrats would go crazy!!!
Part of that plea bargain was taking a polygraph. If he is going to renege on parts of the bargain, fair enough. Let's take this to court.
Mr. Davis said that during sentencing, Mr. Berger agreed to a polygraph examination as part of a plea deal, but Justice never administered the test, according to two Justice officials closely connected to the case -- John Dion, chief of the counterespionage section, and Bruce Swartz, deputy assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division.
There are aspects of this case that the American people were not informed about until long after the sentencing.
If that would have been you or I, taking documents out of the National Archives we would have been arrested, not to mention he admits to having destroyed some of those documents.
This case warrents more investigation.
I agree that Berger appears to be receiving special treatment. Any common person who did what Berger has admitted to doing would never again be granted a security clearance. But it seems Berger could get his security clearance back in three years' time.
I had a friend who was a firm believer in polygraphs. He said he took one and the examiner told him to think of a number between 1 and 10. The examiner told him not to say anything, and then counted from 1 to 10. The examiner correctly told him what number he was thinking of.
I will agree that anyone in the spy business could be trained to pass a polygraph.
Exactly! If he violates the terms, rescind the plea bargain, and let's go to trial.
For those who like to point to the the junk science of polygraphy, how about water-boarding him?
Torture is un-American. Shame on you for suggesting it, even in jest.
If you like to watch real crime tv shows like I do, Cold Case Files for example, the detectives love to have the perps take lie-detector tests. It's not valid in court, but the detectives place a lot of stock in their worth as far as determining whether they've got the right perp or not. I've seen a lot of CCFs, and the lie-detector has been used quite a bit in those episodes in many states nationwide.
I forgot that political correctness forbids humor and sarcasm today....my bad.
Should we expect that those like Berger, who commit treasonous acts, to respond to touchy-feely and "can't we all just get along" futile dialog to get the answers, such as those who always want to use "diplomatic" and "dialogue" as the ways to approach terrorism?
Marcellus: "What now? Let me tell you what now. I'ma call a coupla hard, pipe-hittin' n!gg*rs, who'll go to work on the homes here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch. You hear me talkin', hillbilly boy? I ain't through with you by a d@mn sight. I'ma get medieval on your @ss."
Maybe THEN he'd talk.....
Eighteeen teeny-timid Repulicans huh? Berger should be in prison right now and the investigation into who sent him should be wrapping up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.